Pace lines used in last posted Example
 

and here is the winner Horse 10

only question concerning this was the speed shown at Fort Erie a fluke...NO showed same thing at Woodbine.

ALSO of course ANYONE might have questions since THESE WERE NOT THE SCREENS I USED IN SELECTING THESE LINES.

used the F4 option

Now here is my take on this race
 

The winner # 10 was the race favorite
What bothers me abot these examples is the paceline section and omitance
and that low price horses are being shown with poor total energy readouts

Rather than repost all the pace lines again
Im just going to post my selected lines

Horse 1 No line
Horse 2 Line 1 No problem
Horse 3 Last line -Declining speed ratings last 3 = 2 place finish
Horse 4 Because of the bad effort last I will go to line 2 the 66
seems more comperable than the 71 3 back the 66 was
2nd place finish as was the 71
Horse 5 Line 3 Closes to the distance of the last 3
Off a long layoff but with very good workouts
and the 76 SR is the same as the first ever race for
Ci Jo who won as a FTS
Horse 6 No line
Horse 7 No line
Horse 8 Last line SR 65 line 2 is better but that one is from
Hawthorne 342 days ago
Horse 9 No line off 1077 days
Horse 10 Last line no question

Here is the BL/BL top 2 gets the Exacta
and a more likely top 2 rated Total energy
winner for $ 7.00

and a look at the Late / Early
 

for me a little more klikely position for 7.0 furlongs

Were ever you got the lines from
They are the ones you're showing

again my examples are just my veiw of a race with a $7.00 winner
nothing more really to say

this screen shows the same old thing: Top several epr's just another way to show it. RANK them and there is the tri

yes there is a lot more to explain this: it is HOLISITIC and RELATIVE, not dedicated to a SINGLE entity. That is what this entire idea is about and it seems to really slip by SOME FOLKS repeatedly.


ah yes for those who aspire to the same old thing looking at the performance and not the performer

Doctor my eyes
 

Have seen the fears and the slow parade of tears ...
all I see for the winner in 5's - 6's and worse

8th race - Tampa Bay Downs - April 10, 2006
Pgm Horse Win Place Show
10 Blazing Heatrix 7.00 5.00 3.60
5 Ci Joe Go 11.00 6.40
4 Sherrillsfordposse 3.80

$2 Exacta 10-5 87.80
$2 Superfecta 10-5-4-2 3,714.40
$2 Trifecta 10-5-4 433.80
<!-- / message --><!-- attachments -->

Quick, go to your DICTIONARY and look up the word RELATIVE, then find someone to explain it to you OVER and OVER until you understand it. HINT: you INTERPRET these readings, one does not take the rankings literally. You review it RELATIVELY......Merriam Webster has a good site for definitions.

Look at the RELATIVE 2nd call positions (this is a sprint): Rank them by performer, NOT performance and the trifecta is right there. Just like I have been saying the top 5 EPR now for years. Once you HIDE the later of the 2nd call lines (using the EARLY filter), you get this screen.

Oh its magic
 

Just needed some explaination
From This

http://bindfold.com/forums/attachmen...1&d=1144699641

To This

Nice win Tompkins