I wanted to bet on the 3 (The Elevator) in the third race but would only have accepted the morning line odds or better. Getting 3/1 isn't enough for me to have this shipper prove himself locally on my money.

I'll take Honor Hymn in the eighth at those odds even though I'd prefer to have more data for the distance in my decision model.

Richie,

Very nice comparison RDSS with E/L 2.0.

Could you please post Belmont for 5/28 similiarly.

Thanks,

Ernie

Bel 5/27
 

Interesting results.

I am leaving out 3 races where both RDSS and E/L 2.0 hit the chalk winners.

Race 1 EE:3,5 LL: 1,4 Win 5..15.60 $ 1 Exacta: 5/1...128.00
(RDSS did not have #5 in top 4 BL/BL)

Race 3 Both methods had the 2 horse for 10.80

Race 6 was 8F on the turf and E/L 2.0 picked up the #3 which was close
to dominant early (56%) and paid 20.40

Race 7 RDSS had a BL/BL winner #4 for 19.40. This horse was not in EE/LL.

Race 9 Both methods had the 4 horse for 42.40.

There were 5 races that both methods had the winner, although 3 were chalk
and probably would have been passed.

As for Races 1, 6 and 7 where either E/L 2.0 or RDSS had a high mutual
winner (but not both) it is a harder call.
Yeah I know this is after the fact but...personally I favor RDSS and if I
played I would not have had the winners in races 1 and 6 but would of had a shot of catching the #4 winner in race 7.

Anyway I regret not checking the posts earlier ....I think it is advantageous to present both methods and I hope this is continued.

Ernie