![]() |
gfnut:
Quote:
No offense intended but going back to a race that occurred 1097 days ago does not make much sense to me. I guess you can make a case for any horse but in this case and for me, it would not be a prudent move. The only thing that this would tell me is that there was something very wrong with this horse. His first time back was not much of clue or indicator that this horse was fit and ready to win. Being entered in low maiden claimer after such a protracted layoff tells me that they got this horse ready to win for the purpose of recouping some of their expenses with the purse and betting money with the hopes that someone would claim it possibly in his next outing. I would doubt that this horse will ever be a factor in it's future races. This trainer should be looked at for future betting ploys. He kept this one well hidden. |
Quote:
You ARE kidding, right? lol This horse shows a series of decent races... THREE YEARS AGO. It shows a layoff of OVER TWO YEARS... after the last of that series of decent races. The horse was OBVIOUSLY injured. No horse stays off the track for two years unless it is injured. After that TWO YEAR LAYOFF, it comes back and runs 4 dismal races. Then it is off another 8 and a half months and comes back to run another dismal race. Now you want to go back to the horses "lifetime BEST" race from "1097" days ago, use THAT line and say the horse is going to run back to THAT LINE today? Is a crystal ball involved in this decision? Like I asked at the outset, you ARE kidding, right? |
partsnut
Quote:
|
for the lead
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 23215 |
Quote:
Keep up the good work. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.