Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up

Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up (http://paceandcap.com/forums/index.php)

- Selections (http://paceandcap.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12)

- - Del Mar 8/11 New Pace (http://paceandcap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7614)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ted Craven (Post 72820)

Mike,

I think your message editor is dropping a few 'nots' here and there ;)

I think perhaps you meant:[INDENT] 'With Ted's RDSS2 , it does not look at ties at all...'

Ted

OPPS..I better proof read a little better..Thxs Ted

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesal57 (Post 72799)

Just for clarification, if the 1 or 2-points short horses can be left out of consideration, why are you pointing out horses who were left out and won?

Charles a 1 or 2 point short fall should not be an absolute throwout...but more a consideration

Here's what confused me:
I've noticed in my studies that some horses with a point or two difference in speed ratings can be left out of being contenders...

Shouldn't that read "can't be left out of being contenders?" or even "can't automatically be left out of being contenders."

As written I interpreted the sentence as meaning just what it says - that one CAN leave them out as being contenders. In other words, don't pay attention to them.

Maybe it's just me as I cringe whenever I hear someone say "I could care less." I'll usually respond with "how much less could you care?"

;)

I think I was pointing out the same thing in my post above ... :D

Ted

I should have checked for additional posts. I just clicked the link in my email notification to pull up Mike's post.

While I'm here, can you edit that post or let me do so. I don't know what I did, but I'm quoting Mike, not myself.

The smiley was supposed to be the last thing in the post.

Thanks

*** Done