![]() |
Mnr 09-26-06 (All Races) Using Energy
THE HIGHLIGHTED HORSE WOULD BE MY SINGLE PICK.
RACE -1..... 1,4,5 RACE -2..... 5,3,1 RACE -3..... 6,7,1 RACE -4..... 6,2,5 RACE -5..... 2,6,1 RACE -6..... PASS :confused: RACE -7..... 9,8,7 RACE -8..... 10,9,5 RACE -9..... 6,1,8 RACE-10..... 7,10,5 :D :D :D |
Bill,
my only 2 races for tonite at Mount: Race #3 Win #4 Race #4 Win #2 ( if #2 less than 3/2 at post I will bet my second choice #7). Pino |
Pino, I Should Have Had More Confidence In My Database.
Take A Look At This. |
Parts,That's impressive it even tells you the pct the 1 horse should win or place.Jeff
|
Jeff, Here's What It Projects For Race - 3
|
Bill,
sorry, for race #3 I got the wrong horse for the win. Race#3 win #2 instead of #4 as previous post. Pino |
Bill,That 3 is really a long one,maybe you should throw a couple of bucks on it
|
Jeff, the way I've been going, it would just be a waste of money.
Nothing seems to work. Energy, Entropy, AOdds, and some more to boot. I find that the more you read about these programs, the less they work. :confused: |
Here's The Database Projection For The 4th.
|
Quote:
Reading this I want to chime in. You are very very strong capper.This is just a little rough spot man. Just wanted to tell you that amigo :) Richie |
Thanks Ritchie,
Here's the 6th using MPH |
Bill,I know how you feel I have been having some rough sledding as well.It seems like most of my horses are running 2nd and also some dumb decisions as well.On Sunday the 5th at CT I ran this race through energy and it came up with the 10 horse at 9-2.It was 1st on paragon a,b and energizer.But I still percieved it as early and thought there was too much speed in the race.Also the regular rider was on another horse instead.I then went to my 2nd choice the 9 who was 36-1.I play him to win and use him with 2 other horses in the ex.Needless to say it came in 10-9 and paid over 200 bucks which I didnt have.The 9 paid 28.00 to place which I didnt back up as well.Time for me to take a break.Jeff
|
Bill and Jeff
sorry to hear that ..
If I can I would suggest a strong base staying with one program or the Match Up five steps, for example, Either without software, Or to aid you with contender /pace line selection while using software -a method I am using - listing many programs and then doing races over with other programs always hurts me I am fighting this battle too I hate to paper bet but it might work for you or just bet very small Work to build a strong base,then add bits of info you read about Make 20 race cycles and just set goals to improve on each one by one more winner, or more important a better ROI I find the extra winner works best in this goal setting As the ROI, while very important can be distorted by one very large $63.00 winner. Of course its great but the extra winners build the confidence and the big winners always come around The trouble is, without a strong base your most likely zigging and zagging and paper betting when they do Hope you get back that winning feeling Bill |
Bill,Thanks for the advice.Jeff
|
mph
Parts
why MPH and what "trans " are you using A or B. did you use the 2 line average? and speaking of 2nd and 3rd finishes. I suffer this many times. my 9-1 shot gets caught at the wire by the chaulk. One of the "guys" (i think T Brohamer or Mithel) suggests to play 1 unit to win and 2 units to place. this helps ease the "pain" Rverge |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.