Pace and Cap  - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up

Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up (http://paceandcap.com/forums/index.php)
-   Selections (http://paceandcap.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Mnr 09-26-06 (All Races) Using Energy (http://paceandcap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1577)

partsnut 09-26-2006 05:23 PM

Mnr 09-26-06 (All Races) Using Energy
 
THE HIGHLIGHTED HORSE WOULD BE MY SINGLE PICK.

RACE -1..... 1,4,5

RACE -2..... 5,3,1

RACE -3..... 6,7,1

RACE -4..... 6,2,5

RACE -5..... 2,6,1

RACE -6..... PASS :confused:

RACE -7..... 9,8,7

RACE -8..... 10,9,5

RACE -9..... 6,1,8

RACE-10..... 7,10,5

:D :D :D

gl45 09-26-2006 06:56 PM

Bill,
my only 2 races for tonite at Mount:
Race #3 Win #4
Race #4 Win #2 ( if #2 less than 3/2 at post I will bet my second choice #7).
Pino

partsnut 09-26-2006 08:23 PM

Pino, I Should Have Had More Confidence In My Database.
Take A Look At This.

shoeless 09-26-2006 08:28 PM

Parts,That's impressive it even tells you the pct the 1 horse should win or place.Jeff

partsnut 09-26-2006 08:35 PM

Jeff, Here's What It Projects For Race - 3

gl45 09-26-2006 08:39 PM

Bill,
sorry, for race #3 I got the wrong horse for the win.
Race#3 win #2 instead of #4 as previous post.
Pino

shoeless 09-26-2006 08:52 PM

Bill,That 3 is really a long one,maybe you should throw a couple of bucks on it

partsnut 09-26-2006 09:01 PM

Jeff, the way I've been going, it would just be a waste of money.
Nothing seems to work. Energy, Entropy, AOdds, and some more to boot.
I find that the more you read about these programs, the less they work. :confused:

partsnut 09-26-2006 09:07 PM

Here's The Database Projection For The 4th.

RichieP 09-26-2006 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by partsnut (Post 12192)
Jeff, the way I've been going, it would just be a waste of money.
Nothing seems to work. Energy, Entropy, AOdds, and some more to boot.
I find that the more you read about these programs, the less they work. :confused:

Hi Bill,
Reading this I want to chime in.

You are very very strong capper.This is just a little rough spot man. Just wanted to tell you that amigo :)

Richie

partsnut 09-26-2006 10:06 PM

Thanks Ritchie,

Here's the 6th using MPH

shoeless 09-26-2006 11:12 PM

Bill,I know how you feel I have been having some rough sledding as well.It seems like most of my horses are running 2nd and also some dumb decisions as well.On Sunday the 5th at CT I ran this race through energy and it came up with the 10 horse at 9-2.It was 1st on paragon a,b and energizer.But I still percieved it as early and thought there was too much speed in the race.Also the regular rider was on another horse instead.I then went to my 2nd choice the 9 who was 36-1.I play him to win and use him with 2 other horses in the ex.Needless to say it came in 10-9 and paid over 200 bucks which I didnt have.The 9 paid 28.00 to place which I didnt back up as well.Time for me to take a break.Jeff

admin 09-27-2006 06:42 AM

Bill and Jeff
 
sorry to hear that ..
If I can I would suggest a strong base
staying with one program or the Match Up five steps,
for example, Either without software, Or to aid you with contender /pace line selection while using software -a method I am using -
listing many programs and then doing races over with other
programs always hurts me
I am fighting this battle too
I hate to paper bet but it might work for you or just bet very small
Work to build a strong base,then add bits of info you read about
Make 20 race cycles and just set goals to improve on each one by one more winner, or more important a better ROI
I find the extra winner works best in this goal setting
As the ROI, while very important can be distorted by one very large $63.00 winner. Of course its great but the extra winners build the confidence and the big winners always come around
The trouble is, without a strong base your most likely zigging
and zagging and paper betting when they do
Hope you get back that winning feeling

Bill

shoeless 09-27-2006 07:48 AM

Bill,Thanks for the advice.Jeff

Rverge 09-27-2006 06:19 PM

mph
 
Parts
why MPH and what "trans " are you using A or B. did you use the 2 line average? and speaking of 2nd and 3rd finishes. I suffer this many times. my 9-1 shot gets caught at the wire by the chaulk. One of the "guys" (i think T Brohamer or Mithel) suggests to play 1 unit to win and 2 units to place. this helps ease the "pain"
Rverge

partsnut 09-27-2006 08:22 PM

Quote:

REVERGE: Parts
why MPH and what "trans " are you using A or B. did you use the 2 line average?

THE REASON I USED MP3 WAS TO TEST MYSELF AND BECUSE THERE WERE VERY FEW LINES TO CHOOSE FROM. I PICKED THE PACELINES FOR THE 3 MOST PROBABLE CONTENDERS AND ACTUALLY HAD THE WINNER.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.