Saratoga Newpace , before scratches, sorry
 

I will try to update for scratches if necessary, and at the Spa I am sure it will be necessary .

2nd half

Not sure if this would be something you want to see, but it is Race 1 with my pacelines selected, in both RDSS2 and RDSS 1, not sure if any thing is different

It seems to me they are the same readouts, which I believe is a great thing, nice job Ted.

I did notice the odds are different, 7/2 is now 3.5 , but that is about it.

patrick

Would you like more of these, or other screen, like TPR or Segemnts ?

What's this
 

Hi


Just seems to be taking up a lot space and very confusing to look at for contender selections.

map
 

I kind of am having the same feeling. I see lots of screen shots of every horse in the race. Seems like after going through all the steps to post a screen shot it would be easy for poster to map out who they are betting and or tracking. I see highlights underlines red green and yellow but. Just a. Early 1 and 3 and a late 2 and 4in addition to the screen would make these shots so much more interesting. GS Bill

I agree: brevity makes a point. Also, a picture tells 1000 words.

For those not familiar with the NewPace screen, the 2 Red highlighted horses in the Early column are the Early Contenders, and the 2 highlighted Blue horses are the Late Contenders.

In the above SAR Race 3 image, the 4 Contenders are 5-2 Early and 4-8 Late.

Patrick, I do think the BL/BL screen sample has too many (i.e. ALL) the horses in it. And you're welcomed to compare a few RDSS1 to RDSS2 screens to spot check them, but how about in the RDSS 2.0 Beta Testing Forum instead. Thanks for that one example though.

Later, if you get a chance to work these live, how about letting us know what betting decisions you might make from these analyses.

Cheers,

Ted

Yes two things I noticed when I got home, first the 2 Bl/BL screens were not narrowed down to 4-5 contenders yet and in the wrong place, they shoulda been in the other forum category, sorry Sir.

Okay for NP selections to go here, thou??? Right? Or should I keep them in the NP forum too, it would be whatever you want, but I thought all could see them, as they were posted for us, if not sorry, will keep them in Newpace form too.

patrick

NewPace is great here, if that's something you're using. How about, if each of us who posts picks in a Forum takes responsibility to summarize the results?

How did you do today?

Ted

Ok with summarizing, but this is Wednesday's Card, Tuesday is dark here at the Spa.

thx

patrick

...
Oops! http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/i...smilies/40.gif

Looking forward to tomorrow!

Ted

i think its going to be a very quick summery:o

Okay here goes a try at this

10 races , 1 races not openable/playable, as it was FTS, so 9 plays

5 wins out of 9 races win total 33.8

total bet 72.00

lost 38.20

However we do this it is a negative ROI

But here is the deal too, say we are to eliminated the favorite in our win wager's well that may have eliminated a few of our winners, as they paid

4.50, 4.70, 4.90, 6.70, and 13.00 , 3 possible favorites there

As for exacta's well let's say nothing but 1 little one for 25.50, a big ouch....

Sorry for not doing the ROI Formula, but here it is not needed, I think

patrick

Thursday short card, 2 jump races and at least 1 race with too mant FTS
 

This after scratches

part 2

Sorry for this but today was a horrible day for Newpace

1st two races were steeplechase races, then 1 race was a FTS race leaving 7 races

Newpace hit 2 races for 8.70 and 3.20 , sorry for no ROI, but why bother ?

Patrick

Friday
 

a few races well worth ignoring, too little infoe and 1 race not populating correctly, so here goes

friday part II
 

here we go, there is no 7th race available yet, and yes race 6 was duplicated, bet it twice, lol

Here is Race 7 (13f marathon)

Attachment 23111

I can't quite believe the #10 as E1 - I'd put my money on the #2 instead.

Ted

Ted,

I dont know if you have already done so but could you please explain the various numbers on this screen.It would make it much easier to follow.

thanks Ted

I will get the results later , too busy now, I apologize

patrick

It seems that 5 out 9 races were hit

7.30/14.00/5.70/10.00/12.40 total 49.40 - 72.00 = minus 22.60

exactas were 73.00 total (11.40/20/42) - 108 = minus 35.00


not very good , even with 5 out 9 wins

patrick