Pace and Cap  - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up

Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up (http://paceandcap.com/forums/index.php)
-   Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) (http://paceandcap.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=116)
-   -   Race with new distance for all? PL selection (http://paceandcap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14056)

Hanger 08-13-2021 08:25 PM

Race with new distance for all? PL selection
 
Del Mar Race 1 today- 8F on Turf

Field of 8 post scratch....
All starters have been sprinters in minimal starts- all but 1 lone start from the bunch on dirt.

How do you set your PaceLines for this scenario? Going to guess most skip the race entirely but I am curious.


I had my selections of 2,4/6,7,1 but watched the tote action to guide me. Small dutch on 2,4 so DQ didnt bother me, but is there an ideal way in this scenario besides skipping?

Ted Craven 08-14-2021 02:03 AM

1 Attachment(s)
I think the technical term for this kind of race is 'crap-shoot'. But, also where prices can be had from time to time. Choose your chaos tolerance.

My rule is: demote from Win in a turf race anyone who has not previously run (well) in a Turf race. I win more than I lose by applying this guidance. Thus - there's only 1 horse: the #4 (the rule magically knows about DQs ROTFL).

The default 'Best of Last 3' Paceline Strategy works as well as any, IMO. FWIW, take a look at the Supplementary Factors on the Rx screen, including the PoR Supplementals. Which of the underneath horses rates best? (the #7 Place horse).

The other part of the crap-shoot is: who knows how these horses will stretch out (another 3 furlongs).

Your Exacta part-wheel seems the perfect bet that the favourites will not finish 1-2, given the action on those 2 and the FTS. $6 bet returns $32, or 5-1 (probably better if you dutch it for an equal payoff). Is 5-1 enough payoff with so many unknowns?

I'd rather get more, and would pass.

Attachment 49889

Ted

ranchwest 08-14-2021 03:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hanger (Post 137007)
Del Mar Race 1 today- 8F on Turf

Field of 8 post scratch....
All starters have been sprinters in minimal starts- all but 1 lone start from the bunch on dirt.

How do you set your PaceLines for this scenario? Going to guess most skip the race entirely but I am curious.


I had my selections of 2,4/6,7,1 but watched the tote action to guide me. Small dutch on 2,4 so DQ didnt bother me, but is there an ideal way in this scenario besides skipping?

Here's my pace lines (everybody has some, so here's mine):

1 1
2 2
4 1
6 1
7 1
9 1

My pace numbers point to 4-2-7. Admittedly I am doing this after the fact and not evaluating any of the firsters.

I see Ted and I have different lines for #6, but for me it was a toss up on that one.

Lt1 08-14-2021 10:14 AM

As one who maintains models for each dist and surface of the tracks I play I would lean on the %med range since most sprinters expend their energy too early in routes i would see which factors are currently winning at the dist. Still the best course in this type of race is El Paso.
Tim

Hanger 08-14-2021 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ted Craven (Post 137014)
I think the technical term for this kind of race is 'crap-shoot'. But, also where prices can be had from time to time. Choose your chaos tolerance.

My rule is: demote from Win in a turf race anyone who has not previously run (well) in a Turf race. I win more than I lose by applying this guidance. Thus - there's only 1 horse: the #4 (the rule magically knows about DQs ROTFL).

The default 'Best of Last 3' Paceline Strategy works as well as any, IMO. FWIW, take a look at the Supplementary Factors on the Rx screen, including the PoR Supplementals. Which of the underneath horses rates best? (the #7 Place horse).

The other part of the crap-shoot is: who knows how these horses will stretch out (another 3 furlongs).

Your Exacta part-wheel seems the perfect bet that the favourites will not finish 1-2, given the action on those 2 and the FTS. $6 bet returns $32, or 5-1 (probably better if you dutch it for an equal payoff). Is 5-1 enough payoff with so many unknowns?

I'd rather get more, and would pass.

Attachment 49889

Ted


Sorry I was away today and unable to get on the forums for most of the day. I would think that 5-1 given the unknowns is below the acceptable risk/reward ratio for most gamblers that seek higher value in chaos races.

I do like the demote anyone who has not ran well in Turf before- with unknowns one is required to know a little pedigree or see turf works etc....thank you

Hanger 08-14-2021 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lt1 (Post 137016)
As one who maintains models for each dist and surface of the tracks I play I would lean on the %med range since most sprinters expend their energy too early in routes i would see which factors are currently winning at the dist. Still the best course in this type of race is El Paso.
Tim


That is where models help, to understand what wins where, thank you- the %med is an interesting take, just on the fact that sprinters gonna sprint early thought process, and have little left late.

I would think perhaps Late would be a good indicator of a stretch out type horse if VDC was low with high energy, but I may be speaking above my knowledge level in this regard.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.