![]() |
Best pc & Best sc
I have some questions:
1. In the supplemental readouts what does TPP stand for? 2. What exactly does keeping records of the winning horses best pc and sc do for me? I have several hundred races worth and as yet can not find a clue as to how one could predict a probable a winner by using them. I do however see predictability using the speed rating, line score, esp, and scbl. Froggy |
Quote:
As far as keeping records of pc and sc I have never done that, so if you are finding that they are all over the place I would stick with the readouts that are more predictable for you and your style of handicapping. |
tpp
great for routes & lawn, marginal for sprints
|
Tpp
Froggy, I like Tomkins explanation better as he actually tells you in what type of races it is most effective. He probably knows SPEC160 as well as anyone on this board.
|
Thanks guys,
Things were a lot simpler when all we had was the compugraph and % early. It was either go or no go and we could expect 60 to 65 % betting two horses to win. Froggy |
do yourself a favor
Go back to see how often TPP and FX correlate to one another...close, particularly longer
|
Velocititian,
I wasn't keeping track of distance or E/L, but I am now thanks to you. I only have two FOLLOW UPs left over from the old days, #70 and #88. Last night in the wee hours before I fell asleep with them in my hands I read a couple of sentences by Doc that said "The most important Sprint Rankings are generally EPR, CPR, FW, FX, and SPN. When xtracting a sprint from a route, a horse should be in the top 2 LPR." In the article he was doing this before hides. Something for me to watch and employ. Thanks a million, Froggy |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.