Lou Sosa-February's "Member of the month"
 

I gotta say it's Lou Sosa with this thread he started yesterday:
http://paceandcap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3471

His posts numbered 4 and 5 in the thread really lay things out in a way that can BENEFIT others if they so choose. He has taken the time to share a WINNING method and process he has been using for some time now with us here at P&C. he also shares his contrarian way of ignoring variegate reads in favor of his own "instinctive feel" about the race shape outcome.

All of this done with a 20 year old software application,basic pp's and a belief and trust in "SELF".

He is very consistent in both his open posts and PM's to me. 100% POSITIVE ENERGY contributor to the board.

Thank you for sharing "your way" Lou.
Richie

winner
 

Congrats Lou Sosa
as winner of the January prize its nice to pass it on to you

Those who travel the road to being a winning player have no time
for negative energy speed bumps

I hand the torch to you as member of the month

RK

Well, gentlemen, not sure what to say but I thank you. You're absolutely right on not having ANY room for negativity - this endeavor is tough enough and there's no one tougher on me than me! If I can be of help, let me know.

Trust me, betting a turf horse trained by Roger Stein and ridden by Saul Arias is not an everyday occurrence. But the beauty of the methodology is it sets you free to do so. Back in the day, I would probably have been sitting around moaning about how freaking Roger Stein put one over on the public and bitching about Saul Arias getting his 1st win in 35 tries at the meet and on and on and on. Maybe there has been some growth.

EDIT: I was thinking that I'm pretty sure that Jim developed the algorithms for Energy. He did an outstanding job - sometimes I just shake my head on some of the absurd mutuels it comes up with. Maybe there is something to that voodoo............

Rich/Ted:

Lsosa54 is probably right on when he comments that “…I'm pretty sure that Jim developed the algorithms for Energy. He did an outstanding job - sometimes I just shake my head on some of the absurd mutual’s it comes up with. Maybe there is something to that voodoo…”

The question that I have is how can we take advantage of “The Hat’s good work with the Energy program/algorithms via now the RDSS program, especially as to working with the Match Up? I enjoy and prefer working with the Match Up methodology but I have to say that I feel most comfortable when some of the Sartin/Jim based numbers/algorithms support my MU judgments. Perhaps this is already possible with RDSS and I am not l ooking in the right areas?

Thanks,

Robert