|
gl45 adding the dirt category to the overall trainer yearly percentage is an exact example of putting into context the trainer, which I said you must do. Problem is I never would have the #7 as a contender and NO Sartin TEACHINGS WOULD EVER HAVE HAD THE #7 HORSE as a contender. Any advance factors etc. is only applied to true contenders.This is kind of bending the truth to fit the results. Applying any factors or analysis is only done to contenders. There is no logical way to come up with the # 7 in the La. Derby as a contender.
Perhaps you just found the key to the mint. Would anyone else have ever used the #7 in the La. Derby as a contender? If you can pick contenders like that you're going to be very rich. I'm not convinced this technique will on a consistent basis pick contenders or winners. Hey look with the top 5 you could have had a big Tri. and six deep the superfecta.
Mitch44
|