Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post

Lt1 · 01-18-2017, 10:50 AM

Just concluded a 2nd 100 races test of RDSS 2.1. The tracks played were Aqu, GP, MVR, Parx, and Tampa Bay. The avg field size was 8.7 and the avg win price for the top 5 was $9.72. Here are the results by rank.

BL/BL
RACES #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 6+
100 25 13 19 12 18 13

RX3 PROFIT LINE
RACES #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 6+
100 27 17 19 12 13 12

RX2 CLASS
RACES #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 6+
100 27 17 16 13 18 9

RX3 MORNING LINE
RACES #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 6+
100 28 17 19 14 11 11

All rankings are based on my contender and paceline selections. Avg win price includes races were the winner paid prices that were too low to play and would have been passed. Also note that once again the 3 RX factors beat BL/BL in top4 rankings.
Tim G

01-18-2017, 10:50 AM	#1
Lt1 Grade 1 Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Valley Stream NY Posts: 11,494	2nd Test of RDSS 2.1 Just concluded a 2nd 100 races test of RDSS 2.1. The tracks played were Aqu, GP, MVR, Parx, and Tampa Bay. The avg field size was 8.7 and the avg win price for the top 5 was $9.72. Here are the results by rank. BL/BL RACES #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 6+ 100 25 13 19 12 18 13 RX3 PROFIT LINE RACES #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 6+ 100 27 17 19 12 13 12 RX2 CLASS RACES #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 6+ 100 27 17 16 13 18 9 RX3 MORNING LINE RACES #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 6+ 100 28 17 19 14 11 11 All rankings are based on my contender and paceline selections. Avg win price includes races were the winner paid prices that were too low to play and would have been passed. Also note that once again the 3 RX factors beat BL/BL in top4 rankings. Tim G __________________ Trust but verify