|
The "Doc" guidelines for MD lines etc. were prior to his tapes in 1998.
TT regardless if in a maiden race or any race for that matter is only one fraction and can not compare to compounded fractions and factors which was Sartin whole thesis in the 1998 tapes. Actually he goes as far as to say all 3 fractions as used in the match-up can not compare to the compounded factors that evolved and he cast aside individual fractions (Phase 3) and even the match-up in favor of the compounded factors.
Just about any time Sartin talks about TT he degrades it as over hyped and not the
the magic bullet, factor or fraction many believe it to be.(Not a stand alone) He's correct about that but what he doesn't say is that's it's a very important fraction in compounded fractions because its a part of several different fractions such as HE, EP and important in V/DC. In layman terms as a stand alone it sucks and compounded its true worth shines like a piece of gold.
Sartin had a way of speaking and writing that confused the hell out of members and even after reading or listening to something most were still confused. I once was in that category also. Hopefully I have left the State of confusion forever.
One thing that struck me about Sartin was that in a private setting his manner of speaking changed according to the person he was talking to. Only a very intelligent person can do this based on my life experiences however many of the brightest can't do this. Generally those big IQ's can only be understood by having a conversation with themselves. "Doc" had big words for the brainiest and common language for the layman. Maybe that came from his chosen field that he earned his PHD in.
This horse also comes under "The Hats" rule of using what you have. Ponder this, what line would you have used for his second win race? If you say his maiden win than its good enough for the race in question.
Mitch44
|