Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post - Jim Bradshaw's Matchup - The Final Lesson

gl45 · 07-05-2007, 09:49 AM

Yesterday I received a phone call from a friend. He ask me to start to post again, (i wasn't posting much before anyway).
We discussed the above race, and my comment about the match up was:
Some people will not get the winner because they will use BLS rather than Positions. I might be wrong, but the few times that I analized races with Mr. Bradshaw, he kept mention positions and not beaten lengths vs. the POR that the horse run, and those comments kept me thinking. How could I give a numerical value to the horse's positions in order to select the right paceline for today race? After a few months and a couple of hundred races the light bulb went on.
The following Syn2 attachment shows early and sustain readings using positional analysis only, and not beaten lengths.
For those that are familiar with Syn2 will see #5 excell in both readings.
lbj

07-05-2007, 09:49 AM	#47
gl45 Grade 1 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 878	Yesterday I received a phone call from a friend. He ask me to start to post again, (i wasn't posting much before anyway). We discussed the above race, and my comment about the match up was: Some people will not get the winner because they will use BLS rather than Positions. I might be wrong, but the few times that I analized races with Mr. Bradshaw, he kept mention positions and not beaten lengths vs. the POR that the horse run, and those comments kept me thinking. How could I give a numerical value to the horse's positions in order to select the right paceline for today race? After a few months and a couple of hundred races the light bulb went on. The following Syn2 attachment shows early and sustain readings using positional analysis only, and not beaten lengths. For those that are familiar with Syn2 will see #5 excell in both readings. lbj Last edited by gl45; 08-02-2017 at 09:39 AM.