View Single Post
Old 11-12-2007, 06:12 PM   #7
mufasa
Grade 1
 
mufasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Craven View Post
Robert,

Still not quite clear what comparison task you're attempting, comparing RDSS adjusted lines to BRIS PP raw lines (or why). But congratulations on that $54 winner at TUP! If you're waiting for printing for something you consider critical, you can always do a screen capture, and print that (or dump it to a Word file first).

Ted
Ted:

Yes trying to compare in the general sense because it is more than obvious after all of those inherent program adjustments that the times are way different most of the time to not only the line in question but to all other lines and ditto for the other entries/contenders.

Even when I am home I handicap with the RDSS program and then print out my favorite outputs on the back of one of the Brisnet data printed pages per race. I close the program and then try to use other contender pace line information from the Brisnet data to help me with supporting information to make any necessary separations from let us say the top 3-5 tier. I try to use corollaries for the races selected for the program but add to that other Brisnet pace line analysis for support and of course attempts at exotic play.

I am still trying to find my way towards developing a consistent and preferred way of using the program but grudgingly hanging on to some of my old ways of capping with the other printed data. This win hit today at such a juicy price has convinced me to finally just try with the program printing as you say via the screen capture for all of the extra adjusted data that I may need for additional separation, support, or exotic play analysis. No more mixing and matching of the numbers/data. I will just use the Brisnet printed past performance for evaluation of running styles (ESP), recent class, and recent form.

As always thanks for your help,

Robert
mufasa is offline