Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post

Houndog · 11-24-2007, 01:21 PM

To my way of thinking Synergism III TPR readouts will more closely resemble the readouts of the original concepts as described in PMTR. Synergism IV has more flexibility in what adjustment you can use, and I think it is making use of the fractional pars. Synergism III may be using the 3 year best as opposed to the fractional pars.

Synergism IV most definitely uses the average daily variant if you have it set up to use the DRF variant, I think it uses the fractional par times instead of the 3 year best, and it will also use the relative track class which if you don't like you can turn it off in the set-up menu.

These are just educated guesses on my part, as I did not create the program and just using the concepts put forth on PMTR to make sense of it all.

11-24-2007, 01:21 PM	#54
Houndog Grade 1 Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 1,258	Synergism III vs Synergism IV To my way of thinking Synergism III TPR readouts will more closely resemble the readouts of the original concepts as described in PMTR. Synergism IV has more flexibility in what adjustment you can use, and I think it is making use of the fractional pars. Synergism III may be using the 3 year best as opposed to the fractional pars. Synergism IV most definitely uses the average daily variant if you have it set up to use the DRF variant, I think it uses the fractional par times instead of the 3 year best, and it will also use the relative track class which if you don't like you can turn it off in the set-up menu. These are just educated guesses on my part, as I did not create the program and just using the concepts put forth on PMTR to make sense of it all.