|
Ted,
I would like to thank you for working these races. It was certainly very informative and appreciated. I really wanted to go over the races several times to see where my system might be flawed. Clearly its in the paceline selection.
Things I've noticed
1) You definitely use tighter recency standards then I. I generally would go back up to four lines deep, but I can see where my line selection had me picking lines that might not be representative.
2) I also noticed in a 6F race you selected an older 5f line (during the current meet) that had a higher total energy then a more recent 6F line. I also like your use of power lines. So it appears that in a 6F race you might use any lines from 5.0f to 7f if the horse had a higher TE and the race is representative of what the horse might do today.
3) I noticed that you dont necessarily throw out a line if a horse was beaten by more than 7.5 lengths.
4)I can see where starting with the top three class horses gives you a clear advantage when comparing the total energies of the remaining horses. Its very easy to see horses from a TE perspective which dont have a chance.
5)Its really given me added confidence that good PL selection goes a long way.
Thanks
Carl
|