Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Y
the ENTIRE methodology is dependent upon TWO major factors: the 2nd call and the final fraction. THAT'S it!
Everything hinges on those two things and one just DISMISSES THE REST.
|
If that's your opinion, that's fine, but it is not a true statement. It MUST be corrected, that is the job of this forum, at the least.
I don't claim to know everything about the Methodology, but I KNOW that is an inaccurate statement.
Check Doc's comments "after the fact" when he commented on why he semi-endorsed "TPR" book and concepts. He really did not believe in it, but if it helps some people put dollars in their pocket, he was for THAT. He also says this on some seminar tapes.
Also, if this is your opinion, you should bring evidence, like 2 or 3 multiple 20 race cycles showing your ROI on $2 bets using SOLELY this opinion, and/or tools that uses the basis for this opinion ONLY.
That's one of the ways Doc tested his theories before proving them
OR dis-proving to be profitable and including them in the Methodology.
Also, The HAT was on tape saying that the gates and the race DON'T start at the 2nd call, it starts at the 1st call with the other others.
The starting gate is not at the 2nd call.
You should study and apply/experiment with TPR, if this is your direction, and maybe, to prove your opinion, use it to enhance your opinion/method of play, backed by a few 20 race cycles.
The methodology, if you check Doc's opinion in the Follow-Up archives, is not based on this, but he supports anything that shows a consistant profit per 20 race cycle, whether he endorse's it or not, Doc always let us know whats out there to use....he just wanted us to win.
And winning is defined by a
positive Return on Investment per 20 race cycle.
Check the
1st signature quote below, I have
that one on tape, both are by THE HAT.
VoodooFan