Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Y
I continue to get a kick out of "databasers" and their grandstand approach to a sport that demands a more up close evaluation of the realities of it's nature rather than the "arm's length" conjectures and conclusions of pure data.
|
Multiple 20 race cycles, documented factors used and $2 wagered is the Methodology way.
If the RESULTS documented prove either:
a) Return on Investment is same as other Sartin Methods and software, but far less work in multiple 20 race cycles
b) Return on Investment is 1 to 3 more winners, consistantly, in
multiple 20 race cycle than all previous Sartin Methods and software
c) Return on Investment exceeds previous Sartin Methods and software in multiple 20 race cycles
.....or any combination of the above is useful hard results.
In court, the defense can have 20 certified expert witnesses, while the prosectution can have 20 certified expert witnesses with the OPPOSITE opinion of the previous 20.
Knowledge and Science can be applied or mis-applied , interpreted or
mis-interpreted. Magic with numbers, make them say what we want.
Geometry has a process of theorems to come to a conclusion.
The problem is, though, that something , on paper, can be mathematically sound and proven correct, ON PAPER, but when applied in the REAL, PHYSICAL world and interacting with natural forces , shows not to work and fails.
Which means some Factor in the natural world has not been accounted for, used properly or used improperly in combination of other known factors, etc.
Debate, conjecture, disagreements, arguement, postures, Academic fencing, philosophical superiority, agendas, beliefs, opinions, observations of weakness, perceptions, isolated analysis, interpretations, saber rattling of theories, measurements of intellectual acuity, critiques, etc., ....will evaporate and clear once hard data and cash is in hand, and done so repeatedly.
Check the Factor Analysis manual and the Brohamer Manual to see how it's done.
The Sartin Methodology came to pass with hard data, proven over and over BEFORE Doc came to confidently state his conclusions.
And when hard, physical data and money thru the windows proved otherwise, he CHANGED or at least, cut away the un-essential to less tedious work and time consuming handicapping, and winning more races and money.
VoodooFan