Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Y
What Howard or ANYONE else would say about an independent interpretation of the use of the methodology means ZIP to me.
|
I love controversy and a good debate. I enjoy the exchange of ideas that come from intelligent discourse. I've learned a lot of things that way. I'm sure you've got some great ideas about horse racing, as do lots of others. You post up so many winning races I'm convinced you make a lot of money at this game. (I still don't know HOW you win all those races, but that's a debate for another time.)
You're also entitled to your opinions. The rest of us are entitled to ours. Whatever works, works. As Dick Mitchel was fond of saying, "There is more than one path to the win window."
But since F1 is such a worthless concept, maybe Ted could reverse engineer your version of Validator (or whatever you're using) and take out all of the calculations and readouts that use F1. They must really get in your way.
Oh and by the way, just because 99% of the responders here disagree with what you are saying it doesn't make you a bad guy.
The fact that YOU think that you're NEVER wrong is what makes you're motives questionable.
I just filled up my swimming pool this afternoon. I'm throwing a party for all the little kiddies. Perhaps you could stop by and walk across it for us.
Steve