[Tim Y]

This post does not represent to true Sartin Methodology
This is just an opinion . To fully understand and win using the Sartin Methodology
Please read and fully understand the various manuals in our library

Here is the original post This is not the Sartin Methodology
________________________________________________________________________________________________

The original "truck" drivers found the 2nd call was a stand alone factor along with SP (2nd call and final fraction).

Teaching members continually promoted that fact that the 2nd call was as little as mid 50's percent of the race at 7 furlongs up to 75% of the race at a mile, enlightening hundreds to these heretofore "hidden" facts. Over and over, articles in the Follow Up promoted that point in the race where the various combatants went eye to eye, also referred to as "mano a mano" to the point (2nd call) where the race was determined. The FOCAL point of the entire contest.

When ENERGY came out and revolutionized the way we look at the races, it was percent median of total energy (2nd call percentage of the total) that defined the relative styles of Early, Early/Presser, Presser, Sustained/Presser, Sustained and Late. This, 2nd call determinate, was used by this poster to discover how some horses are going off form and some younger horses will no project to the longer classical distances all by the median percentage rising.

The concept of deceleration (which aides in deciding the best closer in the many turf contests) is the ratio of 2nd call to final fraction.

EPR=2nd call TPR=2nd call and final fraction (I am not privy to the various EXACT patented mathematical variations on these).

I would make a guess that fractal are based strongly on second call as I know that E/Ep and L/Ep are different manifestations of EPR and LPR.

The factor the entire methodology rests on:2nd call