Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post

reckless · 05-19-2009, 11:04 AM

hi Ted:

I d-loaded the TM files for today at Indiana Downs before I came online to paceandcap and this warning tread.

The adjusted lines were a joke... the turf races at Churchill was so off that I originally thought the horse in question probably raced in a steeplechase event . That's when I back went online to email you when I found your email message, and subsequent link back to paceandcap.

While I understand that this problem begins with the Feb. 19 (today) d-loads, there were a few races last nite at Indiana Downs where the horses I bet didn't run anywhere near as well as I thought they'd run. It must have been the adjusments , don't you think?

Could it have been an early sign of poor adjustments, or should I go back to reading The Follow Up?? (I know the answer to that one, guys.)

05-19-2009, 11:04 AM	#7
reckless Grade 1 Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: near Philadelphia Park Posts: 259	hi Ted: I d-loaded the TM files for today at Indiana Downs before I came online to paceandcap and this warning tread. The adjusted lines were a joke... the turf races at Churchill was so off that I originally thought the horse in question probably raced in a steeplechase event . That's when I back went online to email you when I found your email message, and subsequent link back to paceandcap. While I understand that this problem begins with the Feb. 19 (today) d-loads, there were a few races last nite at Indiana Downs where the horses I bet didn't run anywhere near as well as I thought they'd run. It must have been the adjusments , don't you think? Could it have been an early sign of poor adjustments, or should I go back to reading The Follow Up?? (I know the answer to that one, guys.) Last edited by Ted Craven; 05-19-2009 at 11:10 AM. Reason: fixed strike-through font - still don't know how you do that!?!