View Single Post
Old 05-20-2009, 10:49 AM   #41
clore1030
Grade 1
 
clore1030's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Craven View Post
I am studying the effect of TrackMaster's data 'upgrade' on our programs. I am still suspicious of whether the data we're getting is being adjusted in the same way it used to be - certainly it is not, in the case where you see lines with very low or negative Adjusted Speed Ratings.

I suggest proceeding with caution, or avoiding working the cards with adjusted data until I can discuss with TrackMaster (now they say their upgrade work is finished) what exactly they changed/upgraded about their data and how that might affect our particular adjustment formulas.

Ted
Are you looking for input on "evidence?"

If so, checkout the horse named Saratoga Lulaby (#4) in the second race at Belmont. The last two races, both in May on the same track, show negative numbers for the adjusted speed rating.
clore1030 is offline   Reply With Quote