View Single Post
Old 11-01-2009, 09:21 AM   #17
tfm
Former member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill V. View Post
Thanks Ted

I really feel for Rich .. His heart as always is there . Without an automated way for him to lesson the work load
Psycologically he and most normal people will get beat down testing with $2.00 bets
without that extra zero ant the end of his bets It must be a drag

Am I the only person around here living in a real world

The guy (richie) bust his back doing hour aftre hours of work
He has posted here how it took him like 4 hours to do 15 races
He hit a $50 winner an what was his work worth ?
like $12.00? I can't thank Rich and you enough for the efforts
you make to help us Sartin Methodology users move ahead
into the world of today
However lets never forget what Doc was really about
Believeing in the work and feeling a sense of accomplishment
Asking Richie to do so much work and his reward is the payoff on $ 2.00
bets is in my opinion slave wages

I say lets wait to have some way to lesson his work before we ask him to
test so many races He has shown us it will work ,,, done the correct
way
I think that the amount wagered is not relevant here. If Richie can win with this method betting $20 a pop (or more), then he should be able to win betting $2 units. In fact, growing $2 bets to $20 and beyond, is probably the greatest confidence builder one could have. If he were to be able to do that, he'd know, for sure, that he had an income from playing the horses for as long as he wanted.

Personally, I'd continue until I had, at least, doubled my starting bankroll; and then double my unit and see if I could double my roll again. At that point, I'd have a large enough sample size to confidently bet pretty much whatever I could handle.
tfm is offline