Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post - Detailed Recordkeeping / Perfect Example of Why We Need to do this

bobbyb · 03-21-2006, 07:07 AM

Hi Traynor,
I have a question for you. Would it not be more accurate to truncate the actual final odd(s). Eg: 4.7 or 3.6. since your model(s) are reliant on after the event entry and slightly raise your ceiling +-(% ) to incoporate additional breakage that may be received, but not expected.
I can appreciate your sound approach, but I have a problem in my model with what to do with unexpected breakage, which at times can represent upwards of +10 to15% of a return which is unexpected.
Your view with regards to breakage would be appreciated.

bobby

03-21-2006, 07:07 AM	#3
bobbyb NewBegining Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Ontario Posts: 15	Hi Traynor, I have a question for you. Would it not be more accurate to truncate the actual final odd(s). Eg: 4.7 or 3.6. since your model(s) are reliant on after the event entry and slightly raise your ceiling +-(% ) to incoporate additional breakage that may be received, but not expected. I can appreciate your sound approach, but I have a problem in my model with what to do with unexpected breakage, which at times can represent upwards of +10 to15% of a return which is unexpected. Your view with regards to breakage would be appreciated. bobby