Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post

J2EEDeveloper · 01-06-2010, 12:56 PM

In the first stage of race analysis, the color designations for top 3 are based on APV and CR. That immediately points out entries that may be glaringly deficient in this area (45%, 50%). Are there any generic guidelines for eliminations/contender designations at this point, using only the APV and CR?

Individual races vary, of course, but I am wondering if anyone has done any serious testing of the APV and CR designations. For example, how often does an entry with APV and or CPR 50% or less actually win? Or 60% or less? And how much confusion is introduced in the readouts by including such an entry as a contender?

Information, insights, suggestions, and ideas will be appreciated.
Thanks

01-06-2010, 12:56 PM	#1
J2EEDeveloper AlwNW1X Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 16	Contender Selection/Eliminations In the first stage of race analysis, the color designations for top 3 are based on APV and CR. That immediately points out entries that may be glaringly deficient in this area (45%, 50%). Are there any generic guidelines for eliminations/contender designations at this point, using only the APV and CR? Individual races vary, of course, but I am wondering if anyone has done any serious testing of the APV and CR designations. For example, how often does an entry with APV and or CPR 50% or less actually win? Or 60% or less? And how much confusion is introduced in the readouts by including such an entry as a contender? Information, insights, suggestions, and ideas will be appreciated. Thanks