View Single Post
Old 04-05-2010, 10:55 AM   #102
For The Lead
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie D View Post
Line 1 is how the #8 Matched Up against the Pace in this race and Lookin at Lucky at this Distance

Line 2
is how #8 Matched Up against the Pace in this Race and against Conveyance at this distance

Lin3 is how the #8 Matched Up against the Pace in this race and against Conveyance at this distance.

So and so

This is the "picture" of this horse being created. This is the Match Up showing a horses ability under these comditions. You don't need any more information imo

The tandem will stand unless a tandem winner runs poorly, meets trouble etc

Every post i make, that is, every winner, every Exacta landed, every loser, is found using Jim " The Hat" Bradshaw's Match Up as taught to me by Richie P and The Hat.

Is is not my altered version of it or someone elses altered version of it.

The proof is in the results. If they were not, i WOULD NOT direct people to Jim "The Hat" Bradshaws Match Up .or this site.

If people want to create there own version, then do so, but please don't tell me Jim's Match Up concepts don't work, when i know they do exactly what it says on the tin because it annoys me as i think it is disrespectful to the creator .
Charlie, Charlie, you were supposed to be done with this! But no, you have been awake for the last 8 hours trying to figure a way to explain the poor performance of the #8 in the Santa Anita Derby based on the principles you have learned.

If it is pictures that you like, then here is a picture for you from the Santa Anita derby.

#3 – Grade 3 winner
#4 – Grade 2 winner (twice)
#6 – Grade 2 winner
#7 – Grade 1 winner (3 times) & Grade 2 winner (twice)
#8 – Maiden claimer winner & claiming $40,000 winner
#10 – Grade 3 winner

What’s wrong with this picture? There seems to be something in the picture that doesn’t “match” the rest of the picture.

There is no need for a discussion about incremental velocity, energy distribution or tandem concepts here, this picture tells the story.

Young horses are always eligible to improve. If this horse improves, great! Until that time comes, if it ever does, then it remains what it is.

Look, I’m sure everyone reading your posts here are happy for you that you have found something you believe in. And that fact that you are standing up for the man who brought these concepts to the public, as well as the man who taught them to you, is commendable. But give it a rest now.

This thread was supposed to be about major tracks vs. minor tracks for the benefit of new members and perhaps people who are new to handicapping and I am as much to blame as you are for the thread getting so far off topic, so I am going to restrict my further comments to the topic at hand.
__________________
"It's suppose to be hard. If it was easy, everybody would do it." Jimmy Dugan, A League of Their Own
For The Lead is offline   Reply With Quote