So once we
"UNLOCK" the race, and WIN the race, there is a PATTERN there that has happened "before", many times.
So once we WIN the race, do we recognize what PATTERN it was?
Was it a LONE Early, Dominant Early, Clear-Clear Early, Multiple Earlies, Multiple Sprinters in a Route, etc.,?
We IDENTIFY the PATTERN or have
identi-FIED the PATTERN and WON the race.
Now what???
Quote:
The "Hat's" matchup is NOT
projecting pace
running styles
spot plays
etc.etc.
HIS matchup is all about the MIND and RECALLING patterns/races that have run before
RichieP
|
Quote:
".... I was talking with him when all of a sudden he tells me "Rich don't go crazy after I tell you this ok? I do NOT pay attention to tandems. I do NOT project a pace. When I am "ON" I open the form and there is the winner of the race. Try it sometime and see".
RichieP quoting THE HAT
|
Quote:
"The race has run already even though it hasn't. Now just find the horse that has already won".
RichieP quoting THE HAT
|
Quote:
|
" Intuition is pattern recognition. Relax and open your mind to recognize certain races that have run before. Then go to the pp's and find the horse that has already won based on what has happened BEFORE" - The Hat
|
Quote:
It's PATTERN RECOGNITION at a very high level.
When we look at a race it is something that HAS run before. Many many times as a matter of fact. Things change such as
names
tracks
distances
surfaces
but the CORE of the race is the same.
What we CAN do as beginning "matchers" is to be aware of one or two certain types of races that we HAVE seen run and KNOW who the winner "looks like" in the pp's BEFORE the race runs. We can FOCUS on finding these type races to wager on.
This is where Jim's SPOT PLAYS become a SERIOUS weapon for us to use if we have PATIENCE and DISCIPLINE to wait on them.
He tells me "Rich focus on the races that you RECOGNIZE. As you gain more experience with the matchup you will be able to recognize more races to bet on. Take things one step at a time and realize you are doing this for 8 months while I am at it for over 20 YEARS."
RichieP
|
Richie suggested
KEEPING those WINNING races, keeping an amount to users preference, of
RECOGNIZABLE PATTERNS,
WINNING PATTERNS that we have Won, Seen, and can
"SEE".
He also suggested we refer to them , often, get that Pattern
"SET" in our mind.
I think he said use them like a "Flashcards" of sorts, different winning patterns that we can easily recognize, get them ingrained in the mind.
Richie has a lot of "Hat Helpers' and Step-by-Step Pattern Recognition exercises/drills given to him by THE HAT of different WINNING Patterns that recur over and over again.
We want to get as close to "HAT" like ability as possible.
We want to evolve and get better like THE HAT has done.
I did not try this, as Richie suggested, because I could only see some value in it and so me logic ( or lack thereof) went something like this:
"Sure, one could recognize a winning pattern in ones novice state.., but how would one advance and push the envelope of higher stages if all I am "looking" for and "waiting" for is the easy stuff I can already see???"
"How can this exercise help me win and recognize MORE advanced and complex races thats within the SAME winning pattern category, by looking and waiting for races I already see??"
"I pass hard races and wait for the one's I see in my novice state?? How can this make one advance?"
DUDE, IT'S RIGHT THERE, how many times does Richie got to type it?!?!??!?
CAN'T see the forest for the trees.
How often we forget how D-E-E-E-E-P and plentiful the tools we have here in The Sartin Methodology and The Match Up??
Simply do as Richie said as taught to him by THE HAT.
Keep the winning race you won, identify the pattern, Lone Early, Chaos, Marathon, etc., and refer to it often to put you in the zone more and more..., ..
.BUT
Either with Richie's template of Step-by-Step Pattern Recognition exercises of SPECIFIC winning patterns or consulting his personal help, simply
SUBSTITUTE the race you won with the lesson he presented, and without fail, go thru the steps of YOUR winning race as he did
HIS, Hat Helpers and all, and do EXACTLY as instructed, like this example :
http://paceandcap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4497
Find different PATTERNS and lessons with THIS Step-by-Step approach by Richie.....,
....
BUT HERE IS THE CATCH :
Of the races you WON of a particular pattern, if a recent race was a little tougher, harder, complex, murkier,
SUBSTITUTE THAT race in place of your PREVIOUS race.
That means, you may have to pick one or two races in card that are not necessarily easy to recognize,
NOT HARD, but not
AS easy as you normally would handicap your other races.
These one or two races should be $2 bet races. Maybe do this once a month or whenever you feel your pattern recognition skills "seeing" these murky, tough races is getting easier and easier, and you need slightly more intense one's to replace the previous flashcard.
You need to add
SLIGHTLY more difficult races to your portfolio of winning patterns for you to go over when you need to get in the zone, solidify them in your mind or simply practice of repetition so they can be more "automatic" when you open the form, like THE HAT.
Remember Richies "HAT" quotes on how EXTREMELY focused and relaxed THE HAT is.
Richies step by step drills going over YOUR winning races should get us even more closer, with this added twist, in my humble opinion, we got more to shoot for.
HOW many times does Richie got to hammer intuition and pattern recognition?
Which is why I mis-INTERPRETED this:
Quote:
When checking running styles I find a lone Early, but there isn’t any line showing where the horse won the race, but his first two calls indicate that he is a very fast horse and will get the lead in today’s race. This is the horse I pick to win the race.
If I believe the race will go other than Early I may pick another horse with a different running style and try to find a running line for this horse. So in reality I’m picking horse’s running styles and then find running lines that will make the horse the winner.
In most instances I do not know the horse's name, or the track where he last ran. The horse that is going to take the lead is the first thing I look for in today’s race and nothing else matters. I do not apply any
traditional handicapping methods..
THE HAT
|
He was
NOT talking about 1st fraction projection of lead horse.
He was
NOT talking about finding the EARLY horse.
He simply opened the form,
IMMEDIATELY recognized the
"race that has run before" ,
FOUND the winning horse because another horse with a different name just like him won before, then proceeded to find a line to make the horse the winner or verify that THIS is the horse.
And here I thought that the first thing was to find an Early horse.
Spare no expense to make your winning pattern portfolio fun, nice, nice to touch and pick up, easy to look at, fun to look at, easy to carry and thumb thru, book form , folder, hardbound diary,etc., because you will be looking at it often, sharpening your "HAT" vision.
If you only focus on what Richie says in the exercises to do to YOUR winning races, and the races you get get slightly harder and more difficult in a
gradual way, pretty soon, you will
ONLY see what you need to "see"..., there will be no such thing as hard, murky, difficult, noisy races because you will have trained yourself to
block out the stuff which makes us perceive a race as difficult.
Can you see the potential in this, right here in front of our face?
THE HAT did several things in his stage, that I know of, evolving and perfecting The Match Up:
He made hundreds, if not, thousands of graphs.
Then latter, he simply observed horses and there behavior.
What will be "OUR" evolving tool if we can ever get close to the instant pattern recognition level?
It is easy to see in the Pattern Recognition exercise drills that Richie provided, on how SPECIFIC and deliberate he tells us what to
"look" at, we can now understand more when Jim lectured on a tape somewhere , this is why THE HAT stated something to the effect:
"...my eye's
REFUSE TO SEE the Beyers numbers.., my eye's
REFUSE TO SEE the class..., my eye's
REFUSE TO SEE the post position..,
Perhaps one day, "our" eye's REFUSE TO SEE anything except the winning horse, so if we "refuse" to see the "stuff" that is unnecessary, how would we know if a race is difficult, advanced or too hard?
This is The Sartin Methodology.
This is The Match Up.
This is legacy of Dr. Howard G. Sartin and Jim "THE HAT" Bradshaw.
Richie , Ted and others has been faithful in this legacy of information.
We will never get to the bottom of our tool chest, and anything else in the marketplace now or in the future simply cannot compare.
Believe me, I tried to find, and bought, other stuff in an attempt to get a clearer perspective of The Match Up and The Sartin Methodology.
The closest thing was Tom Brohamer's book, so him being a Pirco Charter Teaching member, that really did'nt count.
The other was a sentence or two in Sal Sinatra's book, who was also a Sartin Methodologist, so technically, that don't count either.
Even read some of ex-Sartin members books, sorry, not close.
People's , we simply got to sharpen our shovels when digging in this vast tool chest is all.
VoodooFan