Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post

Bill V. · 08-23-2010, 06:48 AM

Hi Jeff

That sounds like a great example of waggercapping at its finest
100% class A work

If I am reading your study work up correct.
I need to ask some further questions
You bet or tracked 35 races
hid any horse that was 5/2 or under and passed the race if
there were 2 hide horses.

Thats great --- Perfect if you want to follow Doc's guidelines
to the T>>>

If what i'm reading is correct Your greatest talent must be to pick races
with false favorites

If you bet /tracked 35 races and hid any horse that had odds under 5/2

with these results

1st tier winners 10, 2nd tier winners 10, 3rd tier winners 5, 4th tier winners 3

5th tier winners 5, non contender winners 2

that means in 35 races there were no winners that paid 5/2 or less!

That fact is the amazing point and that you found this group of 35 races is the news

Good Skill
Bill VV.

08-23-2010, 06:48 AM	#2
Bill V. The egg man Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Carlsbad, California Posts: 10,005	Skill Hi Jeff That sounds like a great example of waggercapping at its finest 100% class A work If I am reading your study work up correct. I need to ask some further questions You bet or tracked 35 races hid any horse that was 5/2 or under and passed the race if there were 2 hide horses. Thats great --- Perfect if you want to follow Doc's guidelines to the T>>> If what i'm reading is correct Your greatest talent must be to pick races with false favorites If you bet /tracked 35 races and hid any horse that had odds under 5/2 with these results 1st tier winners 10, 2nd tier winners 10, 3rd tier winners 5, 4th tier winners 3 5th tier winners 5, non contender winners 2 that means in 35 races there were no winners that paid 5/2 or less! That fact is the amazing point and that you found this group of 35 races is the news Good Skill Bill VV. Last edited by Bill V.; 08-23-2010 at 06:52 AM.