Thanls for the explanation in the PM Ted.
Onward.
If a mechanical process were the successful methodology Ted, you as a programmer (or other programmers )could write a programme and there would never be another question like the one Bill put forward here.
In other words, we would have no need to think, in fact, no need to do anything except download the PP's and press RUN.
The reason or reasons i think you or other programmers can't solve the above problem is because of what i wrote here
Quote:
|
People know a horse is not a machine. Students of the Sartin methodology that have been here a decent period should also know from their learning a horse race is not a mechanical process.
|
(This then begs this question i think)
Why treat the horses and the races they run in as if they are machines and mechanical processes.