Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill V.
Sorry Just as you feel you are the new Doc and have the right to change
his work I feel his words are the basis of my success
I ask myself why research what has never been published.
Spend my time gathering data and proclaiming that you have the new answers is fine if that
is what you need . to make your living
I prefer to believe what I read in copyrighted journals from a man who
put his name and beliefs in solid written text
Bill
|
You are mistaken: I do not feel I am the new Doc. I too am a student who feels Doc's words are the basis of my success. Anyone is free to use, or not use, any parts of RDSS they choose, or free to continue using Val2 or Val3 or any other tools delivered in the pages of the Follow Up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill V.
Oh I'm sorry I guess its taboo to quote the follow ups now
\Too bad that I have been censored
|
You have not been censored. You or anyone can quote Follow Ups.
Look: Doc published lots of research in the Follow Up originally conducted by others, some of it even turning into whole software programs like Synergism (Purdy) or TPR (Hambleton). Plus plenty of articles practically every other issue. To think that no new research or new ideas would ever emerge from studying data or from refining methods of using Doc's tools after 2001 when Doc ceased his own work, is perhaps similar to the statement made by someone around 1900 that the US Patent Office should be closed because everything useful had surely already been invented.
Ingenuity (e.g. Doc's) begets inspiration and further ingenuity. I look forward to re-discovering jewels I once read in the Follow Ups, perhaps seeing them anew given more experience or new evidence, and thanks for contributing some of these.
Ted