|
Bel 5/27
Interesting results.
I am leaving out 3 races where both RDSS and E/L 2.0 hit the chalk winners.
Race 1 EE:3,5 LL: 1,4 Win 5..15.60 $ 1 Exacta: 5/1...128.00
(RDSS did not have #5 in top 4 BL/BL)
Race 3 Both methods had the 2 horse for 10.80
Race 6 was 8F on the turf and E/L 2.0 picked up the #3 which was close
to dominant early (56%) and paid 20.40
Race 7 RDSS had a BL/BL winner #4 for 19.40. This horse was not in EE/LL.
Race 9 Both methods had the 4 horse for 42.40.
There were 5 races that both methods had the winner, although 3 were chalk
and probably would have been passed.
As for Races 1, 6 and 7 where either E/L 2.0 or RDSS had a high mutual
winner (but not both) it is a harder call.
Yeah I know this is after the fact but...personally I favor RDSS and if I
played I would not have had the winners in races 1 and 6 but would of had a shot of catching the #4 winner in race 7.
Anyway I regret not checking the posts earlier ....I think it is advantageous to present both methods and I hope this is continued.
Ernie
|