[Ted Craven]

Originally Posted by ted craven

here's what it looks like to me, from 2 angles (and with a fair amount of overlap):



for paceline selection, i erred on the side of more recent and longer distance for these young, improving (or declining?) 3 yos, thus i was unwilling to go back to best performances earlier in the year, even if i suspected a horse might improve.

The 4 horses in my primary contender section are who i think could win the race and finish in-the-money. I would have to also consider Brilliant Speed for itm, perhaps 3rd or 4th position.

Bets later, depending on odds. I'll take a look at other races on the belmont undercard.

Good luck everyone!

Ted

Stay Thirsty - who knew!