[pktruckdriver]

Hey Bill

Great work as always, and if I read this right , playing exacta's is a losing proposition, no matter what was used, and quite a loss too. The win bet has me puzzled, I am sorry but you are betting 1.00 win bets , not 2.00 win bets, am I reading this right, as all studies I ever did use 2.00 win wagers on 4 horse's at 8.00 per race, and 1.00 ex box for 12.00 a race which I see you have, so again I am puzzled by the 1.00 win bet, or 4$win, sorry. I see the amount wagered was 2028 for win wagers, that is a 1.00 wager, not a 2.00 win bet and I never ever bet a 1.00 win bet, so forgive my naivety here please, just trying to understand , thanks

Now I have plenty of old races in my database , I had unlimited downloads last year and still have all that stuff, 3 summer months of unlimited race cards, not sure how many races per se, but should be close to obtaining a 2500 race's , I think, and was wondering how to go about doing this study.

Thanks again for the awesome work

May I ask here about wagering strategies, because I see all these studies being done with 4 horse's as the norm, not 2 or 3, so it seems to me that the original strategies is still in place, 4 horse win bets and 4 horse ex box bets, and ex bets are big time loser so far, yet 4 horse win bets, are squeaking by , but could also provide very long losing streaks , what I mean by losing is this, I bet 8.00 in win bets and win 2.60 0r 4.60, even 5.70, all would be losing race's , am I right, and this is if they were ML odds of 3-1 7/2 or even 4-1, but drifted down to overbet favorites during wagering, but the studies do not take this into account, if done with ML odds, do they?

I am tired but very enthused about this, I do hope I am not rambling here, but I have some questions, and so far to me NP has plenty of work to be profitable, but ...

patrick