Quote:
Originally Posted by partsnut
Bill V,
You're right. I was not careful in my interpretations of the screens
and because the race did favor early, I literally went against the grain with the (7). Actually, I should have had the winner in my top 2 because that winning horse was closer to the lead at the second call.
|
It seems that lost in this analysis is the fact that your screen shots show numbers 1 AND 5 as the early horses based on the following;
1 - first call "feet per second"
2 - median energy
3 - column "EP" in the rankings
4 - second call beaten lengths
All these factors clearly show the #1 AND #5 as the early horses
If the program "suggests" early, then those are the two horses.
The chart of the race bears this out.