|
trotman,
Excellent, paceline selection is the KEY.
In addition, Class Rating, Race Rating, and Prime Power Ratings from Brisnet are supporting data.
Pace versus these factors points out Value Plays
Incuding measures for speed at the track and distance ratings sets parameters for the Pace versus other ratings.
Who wins that battle produces value plays.
Players who cannot merge the same data on multiple programs do this because of different paceline selection, perhaps limited by ability of the program to choose two types of varying Speed Ratings coupled with an applied point system.
Sartinesque Pacing then gives one photo of projected fininsh while a non photo type of projection is given from data implied in pace but a little more distinct from pace.
I will bet multiple Value Plays on wins and especially on exactas,
yet tifectas and superfectas require resources and much ticket planning
so I will stay with wins and exactas.
It is amazing how hard favorites have in winning their one third of the races.
Yet. without chalk players I have no value plays.
I imagine all players set their own criteria and odds parameters when looking for Value Plays.
It does require a mindset change involving frustration and toleration of ones
weaknesses.
At present I am about halfway there.
Of course, this is not the way for must win mentality players, since you will lose more often than you win but payoffs balance that out.
For me my handicapping weaknesses are worthy challenges for improvement.
Good luck to one and all in your horse racing adventures.
|