[trotman]

dilivery, I know few on this site first hand. But for those that are searching for answers, this is the place to be. Some may scratch their head when I say certain things and I do not use RDSS. The Sartin Methodology IMO will provide endless posibilities of what each one of you gets out of the PP's, and is this not flexibility. They have documented proof of winning horses and winning players for years, and I know a few of them. Bottom line is if you love doing what your doing with racing and you still are betting more losers than winners, you are in the majority either do something positive about it or drop it altogether. Lasy people have no seat on this bus, there is no Black Box and there are no easy winners. I have always believed and still do, although stronger than most people, and that is, if you give up the quest for looking for the winner but look at what value the winner brings to you, then you will become a winner. I remember 2-3 years ago Bill V. put out a Boxing Day selection and some selection it was. Not only was he convinced of the winner he went all out with the Tri with 3 other horses in behind. I handicapped the same race and I had the same horse to win and only 2 of the others. Well prior to post time 1 was scratched so both Bill and I had the same horses. How he bet I don't know but I played my first Tri in 20 some odd years and cashed huge. I poured a double scotch and said here's to us Bill. I have never met Bill personally but respect him highly and I know many of the reasons we selected the same horses were different so I will always argue against rules or ridgid idea's.