Quote:
Originally Posted by shoeless
Bill,
If you were using Rmath's method you would not have played the 8 as
he was 7th in CSR.
Also this is the danger of including all horses and not weeding some out
as there was no reason the 9 should be in your contenders
Have to say as you showed me once that Val4 is a very compact
program and easy to navigate through.
|
Jeff who used the 9 horse ?
Lone Speed I have the 5 ranked 4th on BLBL but the 8 is shaky
I used line 3. I do have the excuse in line 1 of its a poor effort
but it is its first try at the current TP meet, Line two is from CD
and a open 5000 claimer were the horse was outclassed
Line 3 is a Plus line but then again it is its best ever race and its
over 40 days ( best ever ) and 90 days - (form cycle) old
At 23/1 for me it is not a full win bet but a sure place or show or underneath
in exacta contender
As Jeff shows the Early late graph shows the 5 as a lone Early
RDSS shows it controls the first two fractions, Who is going to close on this horse ?
Thoromation shows all 5 contenders a Early energy
Thoromation also uses a more balanced third fraction in EXDC
It shows the 5 as the winner in F1, and competitive on the turn and winning the race
