View Single Post
Old 04-01-2013, 07:16 PM   #7
atlasaxis
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill V. View Post
I disagree
I find before the race presentations a little helpful
The problem with before the fact demos is the presenter
very rarely comes back with an explanation of what happen if his
selection loses. I also want to see race examples with track condition
and scratch's taken into account, this helps me get a clear picture of the match up.
Since I only bet races( for real money ) when I know the scratches and conditions. I find that before the race
sections to sometimes be flawed.
I find FTL's teaching skills to be extraordinary and his after the fact
screen shots and commentary to be something that Doc Sartin would have been
proud to publish in the Follow Up journal

I for one have improved dramatically thanks to FTL's work and guidance
Its a treasure to go back and study the teaching area post,with all his post race analysis

Bill
Disagree all you want Bill. Anyway you want to dress it up it's still redboarding &/or backfitting the results of a particular race, something any one of you here could do and something a few of you here have gotten pretty good at. Heck I could even show you how my ancient Taulbot software had the winner of the last race at Aqu saturday, but what would that prove? Not a darn thing. I know quite a few of you worship the ground this person walks on but it is what it is when it comes to redboarding &/or backfitting. Carry on.
atlasaxis is offline   Reply With Quote