Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post

Bill V. · 04-25-2013, 02:23 PM

I can't say this enough but your post as I read it troubles me.
There is so much to be gained from keeping a very simple track profile.
Its yesterdays news ! yes but that news is golden
If you follow 1 or 2 tracks a profile is even more important.
I won two races yesterday the first was at Tampa were I reversed a tandem
and beat a 3/5 horse with my 4th ranked horse, It was race 8
1 mile on turf , The second race was race 3 at Penn were my Parx
model and profile showed me a 1.6 ML horse that screamed
NEGATIVE DROPPER I collected $14.80
Without my profile and model I would have used line 2 for the horse
But my model and profile showed me that line 1 was weak
and it line 2 would have ranked probably 1st and I would have passed the race.
Name: liamalexpp.PNG
Views: 276
Size: 101.9 KB

Name: liamalexpp.PNG
Views: 276
Size: 101.9 KB

04-25-2013, 02:23 PM	#2
Bill V. The egg man Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Carlsbad, California Posts: 10,005	Much more I can't say this enough but your post as I read it troubles me. There is so much to be gained from keeping a very simple track profile. Its yesterdays news ! yes but that news is golden If you follow 1 or 2 tracks a profile is even more important. I won two races yesterday the first was at Tampa were I reversed a tandem and beat a 3/5 horse with my 4th ranked horse, It was race 8 1 mile on turf , The second race was race 3 at Penn were my Parx model and profile showed me a 1.6 ML horse that screamed NEGATIVE DROPPER I collected $14.80 Without my profile and model I would have used line 2 for the horse But my model and profile showed me that line 1 was weak and it line 2 would have ranked probably 1st and I would have passed the race.