Horse #4
This is a 3 year old that has raced against older horses in its' last three starts, winning one of them.
Horse #5
Another 3 year old that met older horses for the first time in its' last race. It had good form going into that race and it showed good early form in its' first effort against older horses.
Horse #6
This is another 3 year old that met older horses for the first time in its' last race. It did not run well at all. In fact, this horse has had poor efforts its' last five races. Hardly worth considering as a contender.
So here is the bottom line. We have a field of 6 horses consisting of four 3 year olds and just TWO 4 year olds.
The 4 year olds ran first and third.
When you consider the age benefit the 4 year olds have over the other 3 year olds and when you consider that the winner has displayed good form throughout its' last 5 races, should the the winner been sent off at 37/1?
Is there any reason you couldn't consider the winner as a possible win bet?