View Single Post
Old 06-21-2006, 11:14 AM   #6
RichieP
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeLong
Agreed, this is a total complete linear approach which Jim has mastered without the aid of a computer and is the crux of many handicapping programs which mostly errs on the side of the favorite.

Energy on the other hand is a departure from a pure linear model and takes the match-up concept into the realm of non-linear handicapping, which unfortunately appears to provide the user access to both brilliance and mediocrity in regards to picks when using on the variegate.

My point in all of this was to develop an approach to aid the program in improving its predictor model and hopefully produce more longshot winners, which I realize is a a mighty big task.
Hi Joe,
I am not sure anything Jim does can be considered linear! lol. he is kind of in a very different dimension.

If Energy takes the matchup into non linear areas( I really dont know what that is) then what better food to "feed it" than the TRUE matchup?

Fastest early
fastest early presser
fastest presser
fastest sustained

Kinda makes sense that this procedure is the true matchup.

PLUS NOBODY is doing this. always an added benefit just like " looking left" when the "crowd" is "looking right"

anyway that's all I can offer here as feedback.

great thread Joe!

Richie
RichieP is offline   Reply With Quote