|
Great stuff, things I had not thought about, thanks. My original thinking when starting this thread centered around the idea that paceline & contender selection coupled with surface & distance switches might be adversely effecting the variegate predictor, and with the proper paceline adjustments the variegate predictor could be improved.
My reasoning was that Energy was first developed on the West Coast under optimal track conditions where they can paint the variant on the wall because it rarely changes. Again, my thinking was that tracks outside of the So-Cal circuit were more challenging due to daily variant adjustments and if the paceline was adjusted and normalized prior to entering it into Energy maybe, just maybe there would be rewards for the effort.
I really appreciate all the deep thinking and sharing that goes on here.
All the best.
JoeLong
|