|
Hello Bill,
I'm afraid my friend your missing my main points here. I'm providing information and material many may not be aware of because its not on the recommended reading list or they may not understand it.I believe your real dissatisfaction is with Sartin himself as this isn't my writings or opinions but from the master himself.
I'm also well aware of your love of TPR etc. and your free to choose and use whatever you may wish.
No one is questioning your allegiance to Sartin, his beliefs or guidelines. And I haven't the foggiest idea where such a comment comes from.
Bill you are correct that the TPR/ Phase 1 within the present day RDSS is better that the original TPR from PMTR. I read an article by Sartin in which he said he decided to take back TPR from the public and he made it better. He didn't say how and the only thing I can assume was he was talking about adjustments etc. When I returned back to Sartin material I asked Ted about this to which he replied; he was unaware of that and that it was the same as the original.
The 3 FRACTIONS are the foundation for everything and fostered many new factors
While TPR is OK it'll never beat the proven ability of later developed factors such as BLBL or V/DC for getting winners. While both require the picking of a pace line members may use whatever they choose to.
Mitch44
|