Quote:
Originally Posted by Lt1
Hi Bill. I don't think I ever heard of that use for a model. As one who keeps models by surface and dist I stick to the traditional Brohamer approach. I model the 7 primary factors
plus %med,VDC, and 3fr. I note the factor[s] where the winner has the most top 2 ranks. I have found by focusing on top 2 rankings gives a clearer picture of most potent factor[s]. I do same for the place horse. Good luck with your approach.
Tim
|
Tim
So your just breaking your models into surface and distance.
Is your distance broken down into like just sprints and routes or
the actual distance 5f 5.5f 6f etc?
The next question do you include class? Do you think that class makes
a difference? I find if I break things down into class it is to hard to get enough lines to wonder if the model information is relevant?
Don