Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up - View Single Post

Bill Lyster · 10-26-2019, 12:13 PM

Tom:

I just tried to filter the surface column for turf only. When I did that the summary info in the top few lines said a sample of 605 races, but when I went to look at the sorted data, every race was marked "T" for turf.

So when you sort you should only look at the results in the top 17 lines? Is that correct?

Also the percentages of top two, three, and four show numbers in excess of 100% for each column. Surface column sorted for "T", 605 races in APV, and horses in the top two show 102, top 3 140. The formula covers lines down to line 1775 which would mean that any race whether turf or not would record if the rank was top 2, 3, etc.???

Also it appears that only the column formula for APV goes to Q10000, the other columns cover through Q 1775

10-26-2019, 12:13 PM	#20
Bill Lyster Grade 1 Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Escondido CA just 25 minutes from where the turf meets the surf - "...at Del Mar" Posts: 2,418	Tom: I just tried to filter the surface column for turf only. When I did that the summary info in the top few lines said a sample of 605 races, but when I went to look at the sorted data, every race was marked "T" for turf. So when you sort you should only look at the results in the top 17 lines? Is that correct? Also the percentages of top two, three, and four show numbers in excess of 100% for each column. Surface column sorted for "T", 605 races in APV, and horses in the top two show 102, top 3 140. The formula covers lines down to line 1775 which would mean that any race whether turf or not would record if the rank was top 2, 3, etc.??? Also it appears that only the column formula for APV goes to Q10000, the other columns cover through Q 1775 Last edited by Bill Lyster; 10-26-2019 at 12:16 PM.