Emd 5-15

[Peteman]

R-4 5-4
R-5 3-2
R-6 7-2
R-7 4/6-7
R-8 6-4

Can be played as Exactas,or if value is 3-1 or better win or place.

[Peteman]

Race 4 should be 5-6

[Peteman]

Not to good results yesterday, only posting picks to push myself to play better, keep improving. And to utilize the selection part of board.
Have been doing more track profiling lately and been following the second call positional range of winners performance.
At the track and distance, and have found a fair number of price horses within that zone that I normally do not play. Example.
2c w 1-2 58.33%
2c w 1-3 72.22%
2c w 1-4 80.56%
36 races at 6 fur at Emd the horses that was running 1-3 at the 2nd call win 72% of the time. Race 3 readouts, 2 wins 19.00
2 22.5* 23.9 46.4* 25.7 112.1
6 22.6 24.0 46.6 25.5 112.1
3 22.7 24.0 46.7 25.7 112.4
4 22.8 24.1 46.9 25.3 112.2
5 22.9 23.5* 46.4* 25.3 111.7*
1 24.1 23.6 47.7 24.8* 112.5

This is race 4 the 7 pays 22.00 Mind you I did not play these horses to win, as I’m getting thrown off by other ratings and not doing the proper fractional analysis first
F1 F2 SC F3 FT
Pace 22.9 23.3 46.2 24.6 111.8
============================================
2 22.9* 24.2 47.1 26.6 113.7
6 22.9* 23.3* 46.2* 26.3 112.5
7 23.0 23.6 46.6 26.2 112.8
4 23.1 24.3 47.4 26.4 113.8
5 23.4 23.8 47.2 24.6* 111.8
1 23.6 23.9 47.5 25.6 113.1

NAME A P E P L P NAME EPR LPR TOT DIF
========================== ============================
5 55.17 55.93 54.80 5 86 94 180 8
6 54.83 57.14 53.67 3 85 93 178 8
3 54.80 55.70 54.35 6 92 86 178 -6
7 54.56 56.65 53.52 7 90 86 176 -4
1 54.24 55.58 53.57 1 85 90 175 5
2 53.91 56.05 52.84 2 87 85 172 -2

This is race 7,the 1 wins paying 25.00 3 ep 3 ap(Tie) another one falling in that 1-3 72% range .Missed this one too! I guess pace handicapping is not dead,Who said know thy track?.

F1 F2 SC F3 FT
Pace 21.9 22.9 44.9 24.5 110.6
=============================================
6 21.9* 23.0 44.9* 25.7 110.6*
8 22.2 23.2 45.4 26.4 111.8
1 22.4 23.1 45.5 25.4 110.9
4 22.7 22.9* 45.6 25.1 110.7
5 22.7 23.6 46.3 26.0 112.3
2 22.8 24.0 46.8 25.1 111.9
7 23.1 23.2 46.3 24.5* 110.8

[Latekick]

Focus on the correct things and continue to review your results! Awesome to see work being done after the fact. Good work!

[Peteman]

Thanks Latekick,

We can never stop learning,the mental challenge of the game is enjoyable.
but it can frustrating at times,what is great about this board is there is a lot
of ideas to try and test that might be what you need,pretty much,the history
of pace.

Question, do you use a model or profile,or look for value in the bottom
line betting line,I know they all work.the match up works too.but it seems
you have to find something that suits you, to get the most out of it.

[Latekick]

Originally Posted by Peteman

Thanks Latekick,

We can never stop learning,the mental challenge of the game is enjoyable.
but it can frustrating at times,what is great about this board is there is a lot
of ideas to try and test that might be what you need,pretty much,the history
of pace.

Question, do you use a model or profile,or look for value in the bottom
line betting line,I know they all work.the match up works too.but it seems
you have to find something that suits you, to get the most out of it.

I have found something that suits me. I respect all of the "matchers" on this site. The match-up is the core of the methodology. However i believe that by letting the RDSS program itself do the work and manipulating it in a way that is profitable for you, works better. I studied the final 10-15 follow ups religiously and have basically based my usage of the program from these follow ups. My line selection is specific to me, however after that i have learned how to use the BLBL and readouts most profitably, and especially when it comes to tournaments. My tournament play is definitely more effective than my live play. To answer your question, no i do not use a model or profile. Not saying i do not believe in these things, i just have been profitable and have created success without using them, so why change what is working so well for me? RDSS is SUCH a powerful tool and what Ted has done and how he has set the program up is so powerful. Consistency, review, and letting the program work has been what has worked for me.

[Peteman]

Hi Latekick,

It’s good to see hard work pay off for you, maybe you found a niche , in the tournaments.
Best of luck going forward, may the photos finishes go your way!

Pete