|
Google Site Search | Get RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
Selections Post Your Picks - 1 race or a card |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-09-2018, 02:13 PM | #11 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 909
|
Matchup
Basically the same contenders as the Original/FTL guidelines except now #'s 9 and #10 are at play. BLT/C paints a more complex picture of the race, as #10 shows ability to run fast in F1 and not burn itself out so much. The non-contending #7 still figures into the pace scenario, which means that #5 and #8 will need their running shoes on in the F1. However, #8 owns a superior TT over #6, who still runs strong (Top SC). #10 owns F3, which with a combo of a strong F1 and F3, would likely be enough to overcome the potential early burnout. #1's F3 move appears too little too late. Match-Up Graph: |
02-09-2018, 02:29 PM | #12 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 909
|
Final thoughts on BLT/C and Original
In this race, BLT/C yields more possible "true" contenders than the Original/FTL guidelines did. However, more can sometimes muddy the waters a touch. Although #10 looks dominant off that last line, the reality is that the horse typically doesn't show up in the initial race off the layoff. In layoffs of 50+ days in its 10 race chart, the horse shows nothing. We won't know until after the race is run whether this one will be able to run a big one off the bench. I would downgrade this one based on its previous layoff history. I would also downgrade the #1 based on its Total Energy and nasty habit of doing its serious bidding in F3. Lastly, if you downgrade #9 due to an ice cold trainer at the meet, you're left with the trio of 5-6-8.
The BLT/C matchup flatters #8 more than the other matchup did, although #6 still looms a major threat. In fact, both Sartin elements flatter #6. Overall, I don't see this as a prime opportunity. For the most part, both paceline/contender guideline sets point to the same runners, albeit a few extra runners and differences in pacelines. There are some unknowns that exist that are tough calls. However, for entertainment/small profit, you can't do wrong playing the #6, as it passes the acid test on both the Original/FTL guidelines and BLT/C. Last edited by Jeebs; 02-09-2018 at 02:31 PM. |
02-09-2018, 04:05 PM | #13 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Valley Stream NY
Posts: 9,145
|
Nice write up Tim. I gave this a quick look and my top 4 are 6-8-3-5. I also looked at the 1 and 10 but made them secondary contenders. If payoffs look ok I might take a shot here at some exotics.
Tim
__________________
Trust but verify |
02-09-2018, 04:25 PM | #14 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: The Villages, Fl.
Posts: 3,705
|
Jeebs:
I didn't think there would be time to complete a look at this race as I've been in meetings all day & have one tomorrow afternoon. While away my CP screen has been driving me crazy, I did figure out how to go from 3 views in RDSS to two which helped .However sizing is still giving me issues. Can't maneuver as usual.Driving on. I agree and believe this race has too many contenders for serious betting and more than the other you recently put up. I prefer less for any serious size bet. It should provide a price but that doesn't always happen even in MD. races. I see some dropdowns but their soundness is always or in most cases ? and will be know after the race. Contenders:1-3-5-6-8-10 Final order: 8-6-5-3-10 Mitch44 |
02-09-2018, 04:31 PM | #15 |
Abiding Student
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 711
|
Jeebs, you picked a great work-up race.
|
02-09-2018, 04:33 PM | #16 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pittsburgh, now! Lancaster, CA.
Posts: 2,531
|
well, my 5 contenders 4-6-8-9-10.
__________________
i love every single minute of life, and, if one is lucky,then you must give it to others. |
02-09-2018, 04:34 PM | #17 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Valley Stream NY
Posts: 9,145
|
Wow 3min to post wide open so here goes nothing $wp 368,$1ex box 3568 $1exs 3568/110 tot $32.
Tim
__________________
Trust but verify |
02-09-2018, 04:42 PM | #18 |
Abiding Student
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 711
|
I had a little something on 8 who I thought ran a good one, but needed less pace pressure.
|
02-09-2018, 04:43 PM | #19 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pittsburgh, now! Lancaster, CA.
Posts: 2,531
|
5 not on my radar. i guess those ALW race really counted. the 7 was S. ALW.
" "^shrug^ " "
__________________
i love every single minute of life, and, if one is lucky,then you must give it to others. |
02-09-2018, 04:44 PM | #20 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: pittsburgh, now! Lancaster, CA.
Posts: 2,531
|
5 went off 9/2 missed those odds thought is was lower...
__________________
i love every single minute of life, and, if one is lucky,then you must give it to others. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
20 Race Cycles - For Beginners and Old Alike | Because I Can Jim | Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) | 1 | 04-13-2017 03:56 PM |
Woodbine notes Saturday 4/30 | Bill V. | Pace Makes the Race / TPR | 66 | 05-21-2016 09:00 AM |
Another paceless race - IMHO | Bill Lyster | Matchup Discussion | 12 | 01-31-2014 11:55 AM |
MF Friday Race Belmont race 7 5/28 | Bill V. | Races of Interest | 1 | 05-28-2010 07:14 PM |
Jim Bradshaw's 5 Step Approach to learning the Matchup | RichieP | Hat Check - How Can We Help You? | 1 | 05-25-2009 09:52 AM |