Go Back   Pace and Cap - Sartin Methodology & The Match Up > Sartin Methodology Handicapping 101 (102 ...) > Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum
Google Site Search Get RDSS Sartin Library RDSS FAQs Conduct Register Site FAQ Members List Today's Posts

Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum General Handicapping Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-28-2010, 02:45 PM   #1
BJennet
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 311
Kicking myself

Didn't have time to get down on the #2 ($45 +)in R. 5 at PARX just now. This horse was in a virtual 3-way tie for TE dominance with the #9 and #10, and 10 was NL that figured to quit.
BJennet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 08:26 AM   #2
clore1030
Grade 1
 
clore1030's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJennet View Post
Didn't have time to get down on the #2 ($45 +)in R. 5 at PARX just now. This horse was in a virtual 3-way tie for TE dominance with the #9 and #10, and 10 was NL that figured to quit.
Never beat yourself up over such things. Use positive reinforcement and say that you are glad to see that such can happen and remember that such will happen again.

Easy to say, I know but such a mindset can be better than money as it will keep one focused.
clore1030 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 11:33 AM   #3
mikesal57
Grade 1
 
mikesal57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 3,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJennet View Post
Didn't have time to get down on the #2 ($45 +)in R. 5 at PARX just now. This horse was in a virtual 3-way tie for TE dominance with the #9 and #10, and 10 was NL that figured to quit.
Hi BJ...I did the race yesterday...virtual tie???

the 2 was at the bottom in RDSS ..so get this one you had to dismiss the top 4....could have you done that???
Attached Images
 
__________________
Never bet a favorite doing something for the first time-Harvey Pack
mikesal57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 11:36 AM   #4
mikesal57
Grade 1
 
mikesal57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 3,952
ok...sorry...my mistake...I see it on the other screen...

now a question....whats the difference between TE and CPR???
Attached Images
 
__________________
Never bet a favorite doing something for the first time-Harvey Pack
mikesal57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 01:59 PM   #5
BJennet
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 311
Thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by clore1030 View Post
Never beat yourself up over such things. Use positive reinforcement and say that you are glad to see that such can happen and remember that such will happen again.

Easy to say, I know but such a mindset can be better than money as it will keep one focused.
Hi Charles,

I appreciate your concern, but my response was just annoyance over not getting a bet down on a race that I would have won, if I hadn't lost track of the time - not any real negative vibes. As far as positive reinforcement goes, I've been getting plenty of it lately from all the bombs I've been catching .

Cheers,

B Jennet
BJennet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 03:32 PM   #6
BJennet
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 311
Maybe Ted can explain

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesal57 View Post
ok...sorry...my mistake...I see it on the other screen...

now a question....whats the difference between TE and CPR???
Hi Mike,

Maybe Ted can explain the CPR rankings - it doesn't appear on Spec 160.

In a race like this, where you have several closely bunched TEs, the ranking protocol really misrepresents the ability of the horses, which is why I believe it's a good idea to look closely at the actual TEs, as I think I mentioned in another post.

Just to be clear about how I approached this race, although they had higher TEs, I threw out the #1 for obvious reasons, the #3, because its one higher TE was an outlier, and #4, as a typically overbet class-dropper, of the type identified by Tom Brohamer in MPH, as well as a likely herd-horse-in-the-making. This left the 2,9, and 10 tied, and, as I said, the 10 was NL. So, if I had been able to get a bet down in time, I would have been on the 2 and 9. As a value-only player, this is exactly the kind of race I'm looking for.

Cheers,

B Jennet
BJennet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 05:52 PM   #7
mikesal57
Grade 1
 
mikesal57's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Staten Island, NY
Posts: 3,952
thxs BJ.....nice going...keep it up!!
__________________
Never bet a favorite doing something for the first time-Harvey Pack
mikesal57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 06:57 PM   #8
hansend
Grade 1
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 121
I'll let Ted confirm/deny but since he has been away this is my understanding of it. CPR is comprised from the book "Pace Makes the Race".

In the "Member Contributions and Discussions" section you will see the thread "Pace Makes The Race 2nd Edition" with a TPRRaw.xls. Those along with calculations from the track variant (its like .65/.35 for sprints and .60/.40 for routes) are how those numbers are figured and summed up.

Last I new TE was all three FPS added together. However in Brohamer's book it is calculated differently and I do not recall which came later, either the book calculation or the one I read in the follow up.
hansend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 09:18 PM   #9
socantra
Grade 1
 
socantra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 387
CPR is the TPR, or Total Pace Rating from Pace Makes The Race, the 2nd edition of which is available in the Bookstore. Along with EPR (Early Pace Rating and LPR (the FFR from Pace Makes The Race), they comprise the simplified rating system based on a 100 point scale, which is available in all later Sartin Methodology programs (at least from Pace Launcher on).

It is excellent for choosing contenders, and the set of figures that first made me a winner in the early 90's. Doc Sartin later backed off from it, because, while being a wonderful contender selection tool, it lacks the sophistication of many of the fps and energy calculations. Neither Speculator or Validator show the actual numbers, but Spec shows them as a percentage of the field in Perceptor, and both show their rankings in the Primary Factors on BL/BL. At the request of a number of us old timers, Ted wsa kind enough to show them in their numerical form in RDSS.

Total energy is the sum of the feet per second readings from the fractions of the race, and is discussed at great length in many of the later Follow Ups.

Dick...
__________________
"Ils Sont Partis"

Last edited by socantra; 09-29-2010 at 09:23 PM.
socantra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 AM.