|
Google Site Search | Get RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
General Discussion General Horse Racing Discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-21-2012, 07:13 PM | #1 |
BetMix User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,433
|
I' m Running A Test on TUP Race -3, Need Help
I' m Running A Test on TUP Race (3), 12-21-12 Need Help
I'm doing a little test I was wondering if anyone could post the afformentioned race using RDSS with the pace line selections as follows: I would like to see the screen that shows me the adjusted speed ratings and how these horses rank as contenders for the lines I have chosen. 2.....(L3) 5.....(L1) 6.....(L3) 7.....(L3) 8.....(L1) 9.....(L1) |
12-21-2012, 07:21 PM | #2 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bobcaygeon,On,Canada
Posts: 1,308
|
here you are Bill
__________________
Listen...Learn...Stay Safe. |
12-22-2012, 04:57 AM | #3 | |
BetMix User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,433
|
barb craven:
Quote:
So far my tests were inconclusive. |
|
12-22-2012, 01:12 PM | #4 | |
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 695
|
Quote:
I hope that you and your wife are doing well.... I think that I have a remote idea of what you are trying to do...I did a couple of races using the adjusted speed ratings from Rdss from the races that Bill V. worked and enter the pacelines into some of Sartin' s old programs... From limited races and from prior studies that I have experimented with energy numbers from a buddy, it is not always the highest adjusted ratings or speed number race...I believe it has been always been in the best early pace fractions or best last fractions.....I will try to post some examples of what I am trying to say... Anyways, good luck in what you are trying to test.... |
|
12-22-2012, 02:41 PM | #5 | |
BetMix User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,433
|
Quote:
I did a comparison of this race with a couple of programs that I use to see which one would spit out the best results. I tested the RDSS numbers against the Sartin speed rating adjusted by variant method. Naturally, either method was good and is dependent as to the pace lines I pick, but honestly the old Sartin method was better. Here is what came up running both methods with AmerVar (Taulbot Pace Calculator). The top screen shot came from the RDSS adjusted speed numbers. The bottom screen shot came from the Sartin Speed rating adjusted by variant from the DRF As you can see, one method had the winner in the top 4 and the other in the top 2. Both were good but the latter was better. I also review a contender screen that a friend had sent me from HSH and the Sartin Speed Rating adjusted to variant outperformed it as well. MPH came in with outstanding results using the SSR. Last edited by partsnut; 12-22-2012 at 02:57 PM. |
|
12-22-2012, 03:13 PM | #6 |
BetMix User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,433
|
TUP 12-22-12 (Race-5)
TUP 12-22-12 (Race-5)
Here's another contentious race that favors a sustained type. The speed points and pressure gauge (29X0) indicates this. Lot's of early type horses in this race. I personally favor the 3 & 4 horses. I used MPH for this race using the SSR numbers adjusted to variant. Last edited by partsnut; 12-22-2012 at 03:15 PM. |
12-22-2012, 03:33 PM | #7 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 8,853
|
With respect, it's ridiculous to compare relative value of different tools and methods on the basis of a single race, much less a low class Maiden Claiming race like this one. Even weaker to borrow numbers from one method and adjust them by a different method. Each method may have its own well functioning, built in and coherent adjustment system - and each would likely be rendered less effective - over a large number of events - by mixing and matching numbers from one into the other. Just my opinion - and advice to others, FWIW.
It is meaningless to base any comparison between methods on 1 race. Also FWIW, here is how the race would likely have been done by almost anybody using RDSS, who has been following any of the discussions here about paceline selection and Contender identification. A different outcome than your mash-up above:
__________________
RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™ |
12-22-2012, 03:41 PM | #8 |
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
Wow This is fun
Wow we get to post all kinds of programs
Bill H Here are your lines into KGEN/Thoromation and the RDSS results |
12-22-2012, 03:42 PM | #9 | |
Grade 1
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 8,853
|
Quote:
__________________
RDSS - Racing Decision Support System™ |
|
12-22-2012, 04:15 PM | #10 | |
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adjustments Question | Ted Craven | RDSS2 / FAQ's | 3 | 06-29-2014 03:22 PM |
UPDATED - Official Contest Rules, beginning AUGUST | Ted Craven | August Contest | 1 | 07-24-2012 10:09 PM |
Race Analysis Confirmation using the VELOCITY SCREEN | Bill Lyster | RDSS | 2 | 12-08-2011 01:19 AM |
Bad RDSS Race Data for several Euro Horses | Ted Craven | 2011 | 2 | 11-03-2011 04:24 PM |
Jim Bradshaw's 5 Step Approach to learning the Matchup | RichieP | Hat Check - How Can We Help You? | 1 | 05-25-2009 09:52 AM |