|
Google Site Search | Get RDSS | Sartin Library | RDSS FAQs | Conduct | Register | Site FAQ | Members List | Today's Posts | Search |
Selections Post Your Picks - 1 race or a card |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-22-2017, 09:17 AM | #21 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: The Villages, Fl.
Posts: 3,705
|
Bill V. I agree with you 100%. I can play any track ,any surface and any distance. I can do that for two reasons1) I use a consistent approach,(2) I have found what factors are
universal or applicable to all tracks through record keeping testing etc. Players biggest problems are an inconsistent approach and being lazy wanting others to give them something for free. When one does the work themselves they obtain a greater appreciation for knowledge gained to include the stuff that doesn't pan out. Learn from the experts and that's the rub. The forerunners of today such as Sartin, Bradshaw and Brohamer are easy. Others can speak eloquently while using big words but can't actually execute it. In other word talk a good game but never post picks etc. In anything it's all about demonstrated performance. It's the old "buyer beware" or in this case newbie beware. Choose wisely and you'll be successful. While I agree that money management is a big part of being successful it's all for nothing if you can't get the right horses. Mitch44 |
02-22-2017, 03:00 PM | #22 | |
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
__________________
just keeping my trajectory in the positive http://sartinmethodology.com/pubs/RD...d_Glossary.pdf |
|
02-22-2017, 06:54 PM | #23 |
turf historian
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
|
Factors MAY be universal but their applications or rank of importance varies WIDLY
__________________
Albert Einstein:"The monotony and solitude of a quiet life stimulates the creative mind." |
02-22-2017, 07:34 PM | #24 |
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
No
No Tim you are misleading , The final factors are all well tested and consistent across
all tracks distances and surfaces, What makes the readout "seem " inconsistent , is really the fault of the user who does not pick and enter proper contenders and appropriate pace lines consistently |
02-22-2017, 07:50 PM | #25 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: The Villages, Fl.
Posts: 3,705
|
Yes Bill so true. Their always zigging and zagging.
|
02-22-2017, 10:11 PM | #26 | |
turf historian
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
|
Quote:
NOT my experience whatsoever... I have used the methodology at over 38 venues and found that NOT to be the case. Handicapping Assinboia for example is such an OUTLlER, along with Fair Grounds that one has to almost learn things anew. NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING in life is ONE size fits all. That is overly simplistic and simply not true.
__________________
Albert Einstein:"The monotony and solitude of a quiet life stimulates the creative mind." |
|
02-22-2017, 10:18 PM | #27 |
turf historian
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,455
|
Also using a line from a SLOW track does not covert well to a
fast one ans vice versa. Fair Grounds or Mahowning Downs to other courses. Blistering fast Parx lines fail all the time when predicted to be the top contenders in New York. I used to have to be very careful in translating old Longacres lines to the bull ring at Hastings....they transferred too fast. These readings vary and one has to be aware of how much and when.
__________________
Albert Einstein:"The monotony and solitude of a quiet life stimulates the creative mind." |
02-23-2017, 12:29 AM | #28 |
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
Yes
Yes it does not matter what the track , distance or surface ,as long as you enter appropriate pace lines ,
You are just being lazy, Tim You think you know better than the program, you over analize the readouts and you don't trust the adjustments. You the user determine the success or lack there of because you decide what garbage you put into the program , if you enter a slow line that is not adjusted fast enough or too fast, but there is a better line you could have used , then its you Tim that will lose Look at Parx Race 1 yesterday is an example of this, every horse that ran at Parx on 1/10/17 is getting too fast of a adjustment , This is a data provider issue, THIS makes every pace line from 1/10/17 from Parx a non representative pace line If you are handicapping and you realize this you must use a different pace line But every pace line from Parx is not adjusted incorrectly, You Tim have to learn what is the best line to use ,or not It does not matter ,minor track or the Breeders Cup You determine the success and rankings of the program Nobody else , Bill |
02-23-2017, 08:42 AM | #29 |
Grade 1
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: The Villages, Fl.
Posts: 3,705
|
Your correct Bill V. in that one has to trust the adjustments. They have been tested by thousands of races. This game also is about putting the percentages on your side in many of your decisions. Such as a horse shipping from to Park to New York as Tim Y states ,sure there will be some loses but percentage wise you'll win more of them than you'll lose. The adjustments will in the majority of cases tell you whether the shipper is a contender or not.
Any horse can ship to any track and win if properly placed as to class etc. But then again Tim Y doesn't believe in class which is a tried and true handicapping factor since this game began. Horses do ship from Park to NY tracks and win. Their trainers are more attuned to the class factor and proper placement as are most trainers that have good win % records. My advice is if you know a particular track, distance ,surface etc. gives you problems it's rooted in your handicapping procedures. And until you find the root cause I would recommend avoiding those situation. I go into them with a positive attitude therefore that stuff doesn't effect my decisions. Mitch44 |
02-23-2017, 09:51 AM | #30 |
The egg man
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 10,005
|
Thanks Mitch
What Tim has not seen here is exactly why he is lost,
He probably never took Doc ' s advice and just made his recommended spreadsheet If he had read the follow up he would know that less is more, and to limit his factors to no more than 6. Doc used Primary line score Sup line score Total energy VDC BL/BL E/ L The only other thing he recorded was the ml and final odds |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Woodbine notes Saturday 4/30 | Bill V. | Pace Makes the Race / TPR | 66 | 05-21-2016 09:00 AM |
UPDATED - Official Contest Rules, beginning AUGUST | Ted Craven | August Contest | 1 | 07-24-2012 10:09 PM |
Del Mar Race 9 | Bill V. | General Discussion | 2 | 07-23-2012 09:40 PM |
MatchUP intuition is "Primary", MatchUP mathematics is "Corollary"/Secondary | VoodooFan | Matchup Discussion | 41 | 02-27-2011 03:05 PM |
Wagercapping - Follow Up Articles | Ted Craven | Previous 'Handicapping Discussion' Forum | 19 | 03-22-2010 06:06 PM |